For a long time, motorcycles were forbidden in the main city of some large cities. Then, the ban on electric vehicles on the road is also shouted wave after wave, and there is news on the spot: many places to rectify the old man's music.
The reason given is basically the same: there is a safety hazard!
At first glance, this is not a problem, because there is a safety hazard, so you are not allowed to pass. No fault, no fault?Is there really nothing wrong with it?
In terms of the safety hazards of vehicle driving, I can't list the safety hazards of various vehicles one by one, so please give me a counter-proof of the means of transportation without potential safety hazards, is there a means of transportation without potential safety hazards in the world?
It is undeniable that safety accidents caused by motorcycles, electric vehicles and old man music are relatively common, but the cause of these accidents is the problem of the car or the problem of people
It is generally believed that the drivers of motorcycles and electric vehicles and old men have received relatively little safety education, especially the latter two, because they are classified into non-motor vehicles, and most places do not require a driver's license, so there are more people who drive without a license, do not obey traffic rules, and the driver lacks safety awareness, which is the main cause of traffic safety accidents. But obviously, this is a problem with people, not cars.
If the vehicle could talk, it said: You humans have made a mistake, why ban the right of way of our vehicles?If everyone is reasonable, how do you answer?
In the city, in order to effectively alleviate the traffic congestion caused by too much traffic flow, it is often divided into time periods and regions to restrict or release all kinds of vehicles, which is undoubtedly a scientific and reasonable management measure from the perspective of efficiency.
However, no matter how good the measures are, they still have to be implemented by people, so no matter how good the measures themselves are, if there is a problem with the person, it will not be the same as the problem
As far as the above three types of vehicles are concerned, if these three types of vehicles are demarcated with their own lanes and restricted to their own lanes, pedestrians, low-speed vehicles, cars, buses, and large trucks will go their own way
You say, the current road is not enough to support so many lane separations?Therefore, the only way to ban the passage of low-speed vehicles is to do soAfter that, after the car is squeezed a little more and the lane is widened, there is no place for the sidewalk, is it necessary to prohibit pedestrians from walking on foot?
That's right, pedestrians are now squeezed out of the road, and intersections are basically squeezed onto overpasses or underpasses. This is the convenience that technology brings.
But what about the elderly, the physically disabled, the physically weak, what about them?These people are already inconvenient to walk, many people have a hard time walking, and they have to go up and down the overpass, some people can still complete it with some difficulty, but some people, for them, it is really an impossible task.
On the contrary, the more disadvantaged the group, the greater the pressure on their survival, the less humanistic care they can get, but the basic needs of food, clothing, shelter and transportation, as long as they are alive, are always indispensable.
Therefore, the old man can't use it, and in the future, maybe one day it will be forbidden to travel on foot, so, when will this world be regarded as a world of people or a world of cars?
Article 35 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China Citizens of the People's Republic of China shall have freedom of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association, of procession and of demonstration. “
Well, here, in relation to travel, there are only parades, and there are no explicit rules for travel, but:
Article 33 All persons with the nationality of the People's Republic of China are citizens of the People's Republic of China.
All citizens of the People's Republic of China are equal before the law.
The State respects and protects human rights.
Every citizen enjoys the rights provided for by the Constitution and the law, and at the same time must fulfill the obligations set forth in the Constitution and the law. “
Therefore, my understanding is that the right to travel is one of the basic rights of human rights, and I believe that travel is the basic right granted to us by the Constitution.
I'm not a professional, so bricks, scholars, you are welcome to come and reason with me and other ordinary people!