I am ...... for Ye Chengchen in the Chongqing sister and brother crash case, Lao Rongzhi, who has been on the run for 20 years, Wen Qingyun in the Guangzhou BMW crash case, and Wu Xieyu, the son of Peking University who killed his motherSince the analysis and defense, I have been abused and cyberbullied by many people, some of whom said very ugly things, some people said that I had lost my conscience, and some people said that I was ......
Actually, defending a death row suspect is not a big deal. You know, internationally there are many countries that have abolished the death penalty, that is, ifCalling for the abolition of all death sentences in our country is not a big deal
I am not calling for the complete abolition of the death penalty in the country, but I thinkIt should be prudent, more prudent。Consideration should be given to the procedural fairness of the judiciary, the impact of mental illness, women's rights, and the impact of human nature and psychology on society.
Justice affects everyone, it's like a water source, if it's polluted, everyone will be affected.
Ye Chengchen. Mental problems can affect sentencing. It is easier to determine whether there is full capacity for responsibility or no capacity for criminal responsibility at all, but the circumstances of limiting capacity for criminal responsibility are more special, and professional determination is required in this regard. It doesn't have to be crazy and unconscious like it looks on the surface. The kind of mental illness that most people think of is actually completely incapable of criminal responsibility.
ForLimit capacity for criminal responsibilityIdentification. If it is in the sentencing of the death penalty, it isThe difference between life and death
So I strongly recommend: start from humanitarianismAll condemned prisoners are subject to forensic evaluation
In fact, the review of the death penalty is still a mirror, which can reflect various problems in our judicial process, tooThe SPC has a window into the following cases
For example, Mr. Cao, a witness in the Lao Rongzhi case, also testified before the Supreme People's Court, and in addition to proving the pattern of Lao Rongzhi's possible coercion to commit the crime, he also proved to the Supreme People's Court the Jiangxi side's style of handling cases. Because when he drove thousands of miles to testify, he did not testify, let alone say anything, and was detained in custody for nearly 24 hours, and then under the "escort", he got on the highway and left Jiangxi.
Lo Rongzhi. We need to know that the abolition of the death penalty is a global trend.
At this stage, it is understandable that we should adopt the principle of killing less and killing with caution. However, if the principle of killing less and killing with caution is not well implemented, resulting in manslaughter, then more people will come out in the future and call for the abolition of the death penalty to be in line with the international trend. If the death penalty is really abolished at that time, causing real demons like Fa Ziying to escape the punishment of the death penalty, is this caused by people who are shouting and killing at every turn?
As long as we still retain the death penalty, we must grasp the principle of killing less and killing carefully, otherwise it will cause us unpredictable results.
If you label a "death row prisoner", you can't speak out for it. Even those who speak for it will be subjected to verbal abuse and cyberbullying, and our society is dangerous。The consequence is that no one dares to speak up for it, and an effective oversight mechanism is lost.
You must know that people who are labeled as "death row prisoners" are not necessarily guilty of heinous crimes. For example, Nianbin in Fujian Province was found not guilty after being sentenced to death four times.
It is wisdom to be able to cut through layers of fog and seek the truth, without being fooled by superficial labels and facts that have not yet settled.