Although the Chinese nation is not the first human being born in the world, the Chinese civilization is one of the earliest civilizations in the world, and has gone through more than 6,600 ups and downs. However, although history has endowed Chinese civilization with rich connotations, it has also made its development direction relatively simple, and it has long been "written in a thousand words and digressed for thousands of miles". The article argues that this erroneous direction of development, that is, "Xinxue", has led to the "anachronism" of Chinese civilization, hindered the attention of scientific and technological forces, and delayed its rise and take-off.
By combing the history of the development of Chinese civilization, we can see that although the complete ideas of Zhou Li, Confucianism, Legalism, and Mohistism have been formed, and have gone through the stages of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, Cheng Zhu Lixue, and the "Yangming Xinxue" of the Ming Dynasty, on the whole, Chinese civilization has always adhered to the direction of "Xinxue". This kind of ethereal way of thinking, which focuses on the human heart, has failed to pay sufficient attention to the material world in Chinese civilization, and the rise of scientific and technological power has been delayed.
Confucius, for example, is considered a master of "human nature", but his excessive focus on the human mind leads to a blind eye to the objectively existing material world. The article mentions Confucius's criticism of the Legalists, but fails to recognize the actual role of punishment. However, history has confirmed Confucius's view that the prosperity of the Qin dynasty was short-lived, and that Confucianism did not achieve the desired results in subsequent feudal dynasties.
Wang Yangming, as Confucius's "closed door", even promoted "Xinxue" to a broad sense, believing that as long as "one heart is good", the entire universe will be safe. However, reality brutally slaps this idea in the face. The article points out that although the "human heart" can give people a short-term hallucinogenic effect, it cannot be compared with the power of machines. Instead of respecting objective laws and using the power of science and technology to become the hegemon of the earth or the entire universe, Chinese civilization was beaten down by the West.
The article finally concludes that the directional error of Chinese civilization lies in overemphasizing the dominance of the "human heart" and ignoring the existence of objective laws. The earth's time and space are not dominated by the "human heart", but by objective laws. Therefore, human beings need to face reality, respect objective laws, and use the power of science and technology to create machines that can fight with heaven and earth. In its assumptions about Confucius and Wang Yangming, the article calls for the study of "mind" to have no future, but to pursue the true way of the future.
This reconceived essay emphasizes the importance of the disorientation of time and space and the objective laws of Chinese civilization by expanding the interpretation of the views of Confucius and Wang Yangming while maintaining the meaning of the original text.
Chinese civilization is lost in time and space, and facing objective laws is the way to the future!This article profoundly examines the development direction of Chinese civilization and the possible negative impact of excessive attention to "psychology". This has led me to think about the development of Chinese civilization and to pay attention to the balance between technology and humanity in the context of today's society.
First of all, through the review of the history of Chinese civilization, this paper points out the long-term dominance of "Xinxue" in cultural development. This perspective made me think about the impact of traditional culture on contemporary society. As the spiritual foundation of a nation, traditional culture has a profound impact on values and social structure. However, as the article says, overemphasizing the "human heart" may lead to the neglect of objective laws and hinder the development of scientific and technological forces. This reminds me of the rapid development of science and technology in today's society, and whether we are facing a similar problem, that is, whether we can maintain sensitivity to humanistic care and objective laws while advancing in science and technology.
Secondly, through the comparison of the views of Confucius and Wang Yangming, the article emphasizes the respect for objective laws and the application of scientific and technological forces. This reminds me of the high dependence of modern society on technology and the tremendous changes brought about by technology. In this information age, science and technology have become a powerful engine for promoting social development, but whether we can give full play to the creativity of science and technology on the basis of objective laws and achieve a positive impact on human society as mentioned in the article is a question worth pondering.
At the end of the article, he summarized the view that "there is no future in the study of 'mind'", and called on people to face reality and respect objective laws. This led me to think about how to find a balance between technology and humanity in today's society. The rapid development of technology has brought convenience, but it has also come with a series of ethical, moral and social issues. While pursuing scientific and technological innovation, whether we can draw wisdom from traditional culture and establish a more humanistic and sustainable path of scientific and technological development is a question that we need to seriously consider.
On the whole, through the historical reflection on Chinese civilization, this article has triggered my deep thinking about the relationship between science and technology and humanity in contemporary society. In the era of rapid development of science and technology, we need to learn from history, find a balance between science and technology and humanities, and promote the all-round development of society. This article provides us with a useful perspective that deserves further in-depth reflection and discussion.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!