India, as the rotating presidency of the G20 this year, held an offline summit and then held an online version of the G20 summit. The aim is to increase India's presence and leave a special mark on the history of the G20. This online summit is less expensive and does not require the presence of representatives from various countries, making it easier to organize. India is using this to demonstrate its capabilities and influence. While India may just want to show off a show, for some other countries, the summit may still have some significance.
By hosting two G20 summits, India has not only been able to seize the tail of the rotating presidency to brush up on its presence, but also to show its strength and capabilities on the international stage. This is a win-win for India.
Russia's Putin delivered an important speech at the G20 summit and asked the participants four questions of the soul. He began by noting that some of the participants were shocked by the Russian military operation in Ukraine, which he understood to be a war and was shocked by the number of deaths in it. Then Putin turned to a series of rhetorical questions: Isn't it shocking that the bloody coup d'état in Ukraine in 2014 then led to a war by Ukraine against the people of the Donbas region?Isn't it shocking that Palestinian civilians in the Gaza Strip are now suffering?Isn't it shocking that doctors are operating on children without anesthesia?Isn't it shocking that the UN Secretary-General has said that Gaza has become a giant grave for children?
Putin's series of rhetorical questions reveal the double standards of Western countries. He stressed that the root cause of the Russia-Ukraine conflict is the 2014 color revolution, that is, the overthrow of the Ukrainian regime by the West, which seriously weakened Russia's power. The weakening of this force has led to contradictions and wars between Russia and Ukraine. The tragedy in the Gaza Strip is also clear, with a large number of innocent children and women killed, newborns dying without incubators, and injured children undergoing surgery without anesthetic. However, Western countries have chosen to turn a blind eye and do nothing about these events, which is a double standard.
Putin's speech at the G20** summit revealed the double standards of Western countries, which attracted widespread attention. His rhetoric was straightforward and fully demonstrated the double standards of Western countries in handling international affairs.
The root cause of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict is the West's color revolution in Ukraine, which is a blatant interference in Ukraine's sovereignty and independence. The tragedy in the Gaza Strip is also clear, with a large number of innocent children and women killed in the fighting and wounded children undergoing surgery without anesthetic. Although such a bad situation has been repeated, Western countries have turned a blind eye to this choice, completely demonstrating double standards.
Putin's speech has revealed to the world the true face of Western countries and has also proved to the world that Western countries often practice double standards in handling international affairs. This practice is gradually losing its effectiveness in modern society, and more and more countries are beginning to realize the hypocrisy and double standards of Western countries. Today, with the rapid and convenient dissemination of information, ordinary people can also learn the truth of the incident. If Western countries continue to adhere to double standards, they will only further damage their own international credibility.
On many issues, the West has been applying double standards, and this trick is failing. More and more countries no longer accept this practice of the West and are skeptical of the double standard practice of Western countries. Even some Western countries themselves have begun to realize the disadvantages of double standards, so they are hesitant.
In the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, EU countries have become very cautious about their statements. With the exception of a few politicians, the majority of the European Union** has taken a cautious approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This can be understood as the fact that EU countries no longer take a position lightly and no longer blatantly engage in double standards.
Because of the rapid and convenient dissemination of information, people's understanding of events has greatly improved. Therefore, the use of double standards to mislead others no longer works, and it is difficult for anyone to believe what is said in the mouths of Western countries. While some politicians continue to practice double standards because they are thick-skinned or for other reasons, their credibility has been greatly undermined.
Through Putin's speech at the G20** summit, we see the double standards of Western countries and generate some reflections.
In international affairs, double standards have become a common tool used by some Western countries. They hold high the banner of human rights, democracy and freedom, but they often adopt double standards in dealing with international affairs. They are silent about their own actions, but they criticize the actions of other countries.
However, the world is multipolar, and more and more countries are becoming aware of the double standards of Western countries and are beginning to question their approach. Through Putin's speech, people can see more clearly the hypocrisy and double standards of Western countries. The rapid and convenient dissemination of information has made it possible for ordinary people to understand the truth of the incident, which makes it difficult for Western countries to mislead others with double standards.
Honesty and impartiality are very important when dealing with international affairs. States should be based on equality and mutual respect and avoid double standards. Only through an equal and just solution can it be recognized and respected by the international community.
To sum up, Putin's soul four questions at the G20** summit revealed the double standards of Western countries, which made more and more countries begin to question and doubt the practices of Western countries. Double standards have lost their effectiveness in the international community, and only by dealing with problems in an equal and just manner can it win the recognition and respect of the international community.