Evaluate the report with ** usage
An assessment report released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence reveals that sinceOctober 7thThe use of the Israeli army in the conflict with Hamas during a critical period. According to reports, the Israeli army used a total of approximately during this period29,000 piecesAir-to-surface ammunition. This figure itself reflects the intensity of the conflict and the scale of military operations. Among these ammunition, there are40 to 45%.Identified as unguided"Dud".
Compared with guided munitions, unguided munitions have significantly lower accuracy and cannot accurately hit specific targets. This type of ** has been widely used in history, especially during the period when the technology was relatively backward. However, in modern warfare, with the development and popularization of precision-guided ** technology, the use of unguided ** is gradually decreasing. The main disadvantage of unguided munitions is their low accuracy, especially in populated areas like Gaza, where the use of such munitions can lead to more civilians and property damage. This point pointed out in the report may reflect the dilemma of choice and tactical decision-making faced by the Israeli army in the conflict.
Criticism of the United States and Israel's response
U.S. ** Biden criticized Israel's actions in Gaza, used"Indiscriminate bombardment".This wording. This kind of wording is extremely rare in international politics, especially from such a high level as the United StatesThis reflects the serious concerns of the United States about Israel's military operations. This may be based on considerations for civilians and regional stability. Military operations in conflicts, especially in populated areas, are often closely watched and assessed by the international community.
Biden's criticism may also be a direct response to Israel's use of a large number of unguided **. In this regard,The IDF did not comment specifically on the type of ammunition used, instead highlighting their efforts to reduce civilians**. This response may be motivated by confidentiality considerations, or it may be an attempt to maintain the legitimacy of its military operations in the international arena. In conflict zones, the safety and well-being of civilians is often a matter of high concern to the international community. There is a certain contradiction between the IDF's stated goal of reducing the number of civilians** and the large number of unguided ** that is actually used. This contradiction may stem from the complex interplay between battlefield realities and military strategy. Experts also expressed concern, noting that the heavy use of unguided** could run counter to Israel's stated goal of protecting civilians.
Dive bombing tactics and risk assessment
Regarding Israel's efforts to improve the accuracy of unguided munitions, the United States ** mentioned the adoption by the Israeli armyDive bombing tacticsThis tactic involves a sharp descent of the fighter when approaching the target, in the hope of increasing the accuracy of the strike by reducing the time and distance of the bomb's free fall. Although this method can theoretically increase the accuracy of unguided munitions, there are still many uncertainties. For example,Wind speed, aircraft speed, bomb altitude and angle, etc., will all affect the final strike accuracy.
In addition, this tactic requires extremely high skill and experience on the part of the pilot, and any small operational mistake can cause the bomb to deviate from its intended target. The stakes for using this tactic in a densely populated area like Gaza remain high. On the one hand,The successful execution of tactics requires precise calculations and operations, and on the other hand, any small error in accuracy can lead to civilians**. Experts have expressed concern about the use of unguided munitions in such areas, arguing that in modern conflicts, precision-guided** should be used as much as possible to minimize harm to civilians.
Visit by the U.S.-Israel Relations and Security Advisor
The review comes at a sensitive time in U.S.-Israel relations. U.S. adviser Jake Sullivan plans to visit Israel, and one of the important topics is to discuss reducing harm to civilians. Sullivan's visit is likely to be a direct response to Israeli military action, especially given Biden's criticism of Israeli action.
In this context,Sullivan's visit is particularly important not only because of its implications for the diplomatic and security relationship between the United States and Israel, but also because of its potential impact on the security of civilians in conflict zones. Sullivan's talks with Israel are likely to focus on the issue of military strategy and use, particularly how to maximize the protection of civilians in the conduct of military operations. Such discussions are common in international conflicts, especially when it comes to large-scale use and possible civilians. Sullivan's visit is likely to address broader regional security issues, including the humanitarian situation in Gaza and a long-term solution to the Israeli-Hamas conflict.
Controversial summary
In this series of events,A notable point of contention is Israel's use of a large number of unguided** in Gaza and its potential impact on the security of civilians. While the IDF has highlighted their efforts to reduce civilians**, they have made heavy use of unguided in the conflict"Dud".There is a clear contradiction between this fact and this goal. U.S. ** Biden's"Indiscriminate bombardment".Criticism further reinforces this sense of contradiction. Despite the fact that Israel has used tactics such as dive bombing to improve the accuracy of unguided munitions, in the opinion of experts, there are still significant risks associated with the use of this method in densely populated Gaza. The upcoming visit by U.S. adviser Jake Sullivan may be a response to that risk and a reflection of the tensions in U.S.-Israeli relations at this critical juncture.