However, the shocking news came as scheduled on December 28 – 16 years after their wedding, and the shadow of the marriage was finally revealed, and the culprit was actually Ms. Yu's illegally bred child with someone else. According to the news** report, the focus of this trial was on the divorce conflict and the rights protection of the victim's personal rights and interests.
According to the exclusive disclosure of the top news by the main prosecution, Mr. Chen, in the trial on the same day, he will disclose an important piece of evidence to confirm that his wife, Ms. Yu, did illegally give birth to a baby in 2022, and the mysterious participant was Wu Moumou. Prior to this, Ms. Yu had admitted frankly in an interview that she believed that Mr. Chen had acted in order to fight for family property, and no matter what his plans were, divorce was inevitable.
Regarding the breakdown of this family, we have to mention the key report that triggered this crisis - this genetic testing report issued by an authoritative organization that "the three children are not Mr. Chen's parents". The tragedy of this marriage can be traced back to December 28, 2007, when Mr. Chen and Ms. Yu entered the palace of marriage. At that time, he was mainly engaged in freight transportation around Shangrao City, Jiangxi Province, and could only find time to go home to visit his family two or three times a month, and the responsibility for taking care of the children naturally fell to Ms. Yu. Over the years, they have had three lovely daughters.
Until an ordinary day in 2021, Mr. Chen accidentally witnessed Ms. Yu leaving the hotel elevator with another man. The strange man was said to be a real estate developer in the Quzhou area. It was because of this unexpected encounter that he and Ms. Yu broke out into a fierce quarrel, and then Ms. Yu desperately moved back to her parents' house with the child and blacklisted Mr. Chen. Since then, Mr. Chen has gradually doubted the authenticity of the child's bloodline. Verification: Based on the final results of genetic analysis, it was not possible to determine who Mr. Chen was. The biological father of the child.
Until the moment Mr. Chen learned the truth, his heart was like a turbulent surge. He took the appraisal report to ask Ms. Yu, but at his mother-in-law's house, he had an argument with the old man because of a disagreement, causing the other party to fall and be injured. After medical evaluation, the degree of injury of the old man is equivalent to a minor injury of the second degree. Mr. Chen felt deeply guilty, and finally chose to apologize to his mother-in-law and pay the relevant medical expenses, and at the same time, because he was suspected of being involved in the matter, he needed to be investigated and temporarily detained.
And behind all this, there are often more intricate grievances and hatreds. Mr. Chen's house was damaged by Ms. Yu and Mr. Wu in May of the same year. **After investigation, it was determined that there was indeed an improper relationship between Ms. Yu and Mr. Wu. The administrative penalty decision pointed out that in the early morning of May 28, 2022, because they were suspected of having an improper relationship, Ms. Yu and Wu used electrical tape to place two firecrackers with 36 spark strips in front of Mr. Chen's residence, and placed a pyrotechnic device capable of firing cupola next to the window of the bathroom in the backyard. Then, they took advantage of the low burning temperature of the mosquito coils to deliberately delay the time of the fireworks, so that this series of actions directly led to the loss of property worth about 582 yuan.
Shortly after the incident, Wu Moumou was sentenced to 10 days of administrative detention in accordance with the law, and Ms. Yu, who was the initiator, was also sentenced to 8 days of administrative detention. Mr. Chen's father was physically and mentally exhausted because of this turmoil, and had to be admitted to the hospital for **.
In addition to civil disputes, criminal proceedings are planned"
In May this year, Mr. Chen Zhixian received a non-prosecution decision from the People's Procuratorate of Dexing City, Jiangxi Province, which clearly stated that the acts committed against Chen Zhixian were not recognized as criminal acts because the circumstances were minor and the harm was not enough to meet the criminal standards, and the compulsory measures taken by the public security organs against him for release on bail pending trial also ended.
Mr. Chen Zhixian revealed:"Since the end of my bail trial, I have been looking for a good lawyer to protect my legitimate interests. "
In August this year, Chen Zhixian posted relevant information on his personal social platform for the first time, claiming that he had hired a professional lawyer to assist in legal rights protection work. At that time, in an interview with our "Top News" reporter, he made it clear that he would first track down Ms. Yu'Firecrackers blow up the house'Criminal liability in the incident;If other conclusive evidence is found later, every effort will be made to prosecute him for the crime of bigamy;If the prosecution is not successful, a divorce lawsuit will be filed. Chen Zhixian said firmly:"I will fight for all the compensation I deserve, including all that I deserve. "
On December 24 of the same year, on the eve of the trial, Mr. Chen Zhixian provided us with two summons from the People's Court of Dexing City, Jiangxi Province, revealing that the cases he had recently led mainly involved divorce disputes and personality rights disputes.
The next day, December 28, Chen Zhixian again revealed new evidence to prove that his wife, Ms. Yu, gave birth to their fourth child in the Shangrao area in 2022, and that the person who accompanied the delivery was none other than Wu Moumou, who maintained an improper intimate relationship with Ms. Yu.
Chen Zhixian admitted to our "Top News" reporter that in the future, he will continue to seek the traceability of Ms. Yu's criminal responsibility from the local ** department. He noted that although a criminal case was requested last year, it was not granted. Chan emphasised that the newly disclosed evidence was the most powerful evidence to prove his wife's criminal responsibility.
Regarding this incident, Chen Zhixian sighed:"It's really unbelievable, and it's a strange thing that goes beyond the bottom line of ordinary people."
The woman claimed that the man's actions were solely motivated"Get noticed"purpose.
Previously, the reporter of Top News also successfully contacted Ms. Yu, another key witness in the incident.
In the same vein as she did in her earlier interview, Ms. Yu firmly stated that all of Chan's actions were aimed at drawing attention. She said: "In fact, this matter has attracted social attention last year and gradually subsided, but for some reason, he chose to post ** on the Douyin platform to attract new attention." ”
Ms. Yu stated that after her marriage, she was attacked by her husband's domestic violence and was even taken to the hospital** as a result. Regarding this, Chen Zhixian also frankly admitted in a previous interview that he had beaten his wife twice, the first time was in the early morning when he happened to bump into her in the same room with the opposite sex;The second time was a dispute between husband and wife caused by an online loan issue, and he slapped his wife in anger. "Although I have filed for divorce several times, he has always insisted that he does not agree. Ms. Yu revealed.
Regarding whether she had an extramarital affair, Ms. Yu firmly denied that there was an improper relationship with the rumored "Quzhou businessman". According to Ms. Yu's own description, she and Wu Moumou have only known each other for more than a year, and during their travels to and from Quzhou, they all stayed at Chen Zhixian's sister's home.
Regarding the child's life history, Ms. Yu stressed that she had never recognized that the child was not Chen Zhixian's biological child, including the so-called DNA paternity test results that she had heard. "Does it really matter if he says right and wrong," she saidEven if the DNA test result is 100% accurate, can you conclude that the child must not be his?I don't know anything, he (Chen Zhixian) is there alone. Ms. Yu said that since the beginning of the incident, Chen Zhixian has unilaterally made accusations throughout the whole process.
In the aftermath of this turmoil, Ms. Yu's life was also severely affected and she was even unable to work normally for a short period of time. She firmly believes that Chen Zhixian's move is purely to coerce her and her children to give up the dignity of life.
Ms. Yu revealed to the reporter of Top News that it was precisely because Chen Zhixian was eager for money that he would do so. When asked whether Chen Zhixian would choose to fight if she took legal measures, Ms. Yu replied without hesitation: "Divorce is an inevitable choice, otherwise how can we talk about life?"”
Zhou Zhaocheng, the chief lawyer at Beijing Anjian Law Firm, responded to an interview conducted by Top News on December 28. In his reply, he made it clear that although the matter involved legal issues, the most important thing was that the criminal law could not effectively control it. On this basis, he made a detailed analysis of the so-called "new evidence" about the fourth child that Chen Zhixian had recently put forward.
Lawyer Zhou Zhaocheng pointed out that this view is more inclined to be Mr. Chen's own subjective view. According to the current legal concept, the crime of bigamy is usually regarded as one of two forms in the legal sense, i.e. having entered into two marriages at the legal level and holding two legal marriage certificates, or actually living together as husband and wife outside the legal marriage.
Regarding the crime of fraud, lawyer Zhou Zhaocheng made it clear that this type of crime requires the perpetrator to have a motive of "illegally embezzling other people's property". The reason why the lady made those deceptive words and deeds to Mr. Chen was more in the hope of providing legal identity for the children so that they could be raised smoothly. In this way, it is difficult to say that her purpose was to illegally take possession of Mr. Chen's property.
However, he also emphasized that many people may refer to this situation as fraudulent parenting. However, fraudulent maintenance does fall under the realm of tort under international law. Therefore, Mr. Chen, as the injured party, has every right to resort to divorce proceedings and recover the lengthy maintenance expenses of the past, and at the same time, he can also claim a share of the property. Finally, if it is indeed found that one party is clearly at fault, they may even be appropriately restricted or even not entitled to access the property in the distribution of the property according to the relevant laws and regulations.
3. In the case of non-biological children, the woman had a fourth child with someone else