The signing of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 is for the United StatesMilitarySpending and security posture have a significant impact. This bill not only authorizes $886 billion annuallyMilitaryThe spending also includes a number of measures to strengthen U.S. security and cooperation with allies in the Indo-Pacific region. One of the high-profile provisions is the prohibition on federal agenciesMade in ChinaofDrones。This decision has sparked widespread discussion and repercussions. Although the bill does not explicitly name names, its restrictions include China's two largest ones, the report saidDronesmanufacturers, which are all over the worldDronesThe share of the market is more than 70%.
The National Defense Authorization Act clarifies the U.S. presence in the Indo-Pacific region in fiscal year 2024MilitaryStrategy and priorities. The bill is intended to be strengthened by reinforcing theMilitaryposture and capabilities to ensure U.S. security and interests in the region. This shows that the United States attaches great importance to the geopolitical importance of the Indo-Pacific region and has taken the necessary steps to preserve its position. It's not just a simple thingMilitaryAction is a kind of statement and strategic deployment of the United States on the global stage.
To achieve this, the United States needs to actively engage in cooperation with its allies and strengthen itselfMilitaryAbility. The signing of the bill provides the United States with additional financial support to increase defense spending and procure advanced onesMilitaryEquip. This will help further strengthen the U.S. presence and influence in the Indo-Pacific region.
An important element of the bill is the prohibition of use by federal agenciesMade in ChinaofDronesDronesAs an advancedMilitaryTechnical equipment, with a wide range of application prospects and strategic significance. However, it can also be abused and manipulated, posing a potential threat to ***.
The report mentions that federal agencies are prohibited from using ChinaDronesThe restriction is on ChinaDronesA response to the manufacturer's monopoly position in the global market. These two are ChineseDronesThe company occupies the globeDronesMore than 70% of the market share. Although the bill does not explicitly name any country or company, in fact, it is against ChinaDronesThe manufacturer's limitations are obvious.
This ban is of great significance to the United States. DronesAs an advanced technological equipment, there is a potential risk of espionage and aggressiveness. By limitingMade in ChinaofDrones, the United States can reduce security risks and protect its own national interests.
China's spokesperson said at a regular press conference in July this yearU.S. SenateOpposition was expressed through amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act. She stressed that China firmly opposes "using the National Defense Authorization Act to carry negative content related to China." This shows that China is opposed to this ban and considers it to be against ChinaDronesUnfair treatment by manufacturers.
However, the decision of the United States is based on the consideration of safeguarding its own interests and interests. DronesTechnological developments have made it possible to use it for intelligence gathering, cyber attacks, and other potentially hostile operations. AgainstMade in ChinaofDronesrestrictions can help the U.S. protect against potential security risks. Both sides forDronesThere are differing views on the use of the country, which is also an aspect of the strategic competition between the two countries.
The National Defense Authorization Act prohibits federal agencies from using ChinaDronesThe decision was made to safeguard the interests of the United States. DronesAs an advancedMilitarytechnical equipment, with potential security risks. By limitingMade in ChinaofDrones, the United States can reduce security threats and protect its own national interests. The Chinese side opposes this, believing that it is against ChinaDronesUnfair treatment by manufacturers. However, the decision of the United States is based on its own considerations and is also part of safeguarding its own interests in global strategic competition. between the two countries forDronesThere are differences and controversies in the use of the two countries, which reflects the fact that the two countries are inMilitaryTechnological and geopolitical competition.