Since the beginning of the new year, many previously promising events have once again become obscure, the most notable example of which is the course of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
At the end of last year, as the conflict between Palestine and Israel intensified, Europe and the United States chose to reduce their military support for Ukraine, and tried to force Ukraine to reconcile with Russia behind the scenes through this strategy, in order to end the conflict between Russia and Ukraine as soon as possible.
The poor performance of the Ukrainian army on the battlefield also seems to verify this fact. Although Ukraine's ** Zelensky seems resolute on the surface, in fact he has openly acknowledged the various challenges that Ukraine faces in the war and the failure to achieve the expected goal of counterattack.
The army of the state of Ukraine.
But surprisingly, the situation has changed unusually recently. Ukrainian forces used long-range strikes** to attack a large Russian amphibious landing ship on the Crimean peninsula and caused damage to the ship.
At the same time, Ukraine has also used drone and missile technology to carry out direct attacks on Russian domestic targets, resulting in a large number of personnel**. This action directly led to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, which had already de-escalated, and became more intense again.
In order to retaliate, Russia has launched a new round of drone and missile attacks on targets in Ukraine, and has intensified its offensive on the frontline battlefield, which has not only brought greater losses to the Ukrainian army, but also made it a luxury to want the conflict to end in a reconciled way with Ukraine in the short term.
So why is the situation evolving this way?Will Ukraine's firm stance inject more uncertainty into this conflict?
Harbor Zone. From an objective point of view, Ukraine's rekindling of enthusiasm for this conflict by attacking Russian civilian facilities or the ** where Russian troops docked at ports in Crimea is not particularly difficult at the military level and has not achieved much military results.
In fact, the current confrontation between Russia and Ukraine on the battlefield is like a dog's tooth, and the sea and land borders between Russia and Ukraine are quite long, so if you only use long-range ** to attack Russia, it is always possible to achieve this goal as long as Ukraine accumulates some aid funds from Europe and the United States.
Regardless of whether Russia's domestic defense capability is flawed, as long as Ukraine chooses a long-range "saturation" offensive strategy and the targets it attacks do not have much military significance, then these targets will not be considered civilian targets that need to be protected in a focused manner, and therefore, Russia cannot fully defend against them.
However, just by harassing Russia itself, it may bring a certain degree of domestic pressure to Putin, but this does not actually have much practical significance for alleviating Ukraine's unfavorable situation on the frontal battlefield.
* The army. Compared with Ukraine, Russia is equipped with a large number of long-range precision strikes**, such as ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, unmanned aerial vehicles, tactical bombers and strategic bombers, all of which have shown obvious superiority in numbers.
Although the Russian army has always had air supremacy on the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield, this will only put Ukraine at a disadvantage on the land battlefield, and it does not mean that Ukraine will directly lose the war.
Imagine if Russia had an overwhelming military superiority but failed to utilize long-range means of attack, causing Ukraine to fall into chaos and lose the war, Zelensky, a country already facing an exhaustion of military aid, would actually have a harder time achieving that.
It is clear that this action by Zelensky is more like a clear statement to the United States and the West that Ukraine will not easily admit defeat. Frankly, Zelensky's ** has sensed that European and American countries are using all means to force them to seek a peaceful solution to Russia.
Ukraine's name is Zelensky.
However, Zelensky and the Ukraine he leads** have actually devoted all their political careers to this conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
Everyone has the opportunity to make a peace request to Russia, but Zelensky does not have such an opportunity at the moment, and it is unlikely that they will take the initiative to choose peace talks with Russia in the case of acknowledging that the four regions of eastern Ukraine have been annexed by Russia.
In fact, this has led to a subtle opposition between Zelensky's ** and the overall intentions of the West. At the beginning of the new year, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine suddenly intensified, mainly because the will between Ukraine and Europe and the United States did not coincide. So, what impact will this action have on the global landscape?
First of all, this could lead to tensions in Ukraine's relations with the West, more precisely, a further escalation of the contradictions between Zelensky and the West, and it could even lead to. According to a report by the United Kingdom, when Zelensky visited at the beginning of the new year, he expressed strong dissatisfaction with the instability of some Western allies and the cold attitude of his compatriots.
Russia's ** is Putin.
He openly stated that if Western countries do not provide ** assistance, then they will "stand aside", and the population of Ukraine will firmly continue their position. Such firm rhetoric profoundly reflects Zelensky's dissatisfaction and indignation against the United States and the West.
At present, it is not only Zelensky who is dissatisfied, but also the United States and Western countries are dissatisfied with Ukraine's "out-of-control" behavior.
According to a report by Russia, former CIA analyst Larry Johnson recently pointed out that the United States is likely to blame Zelensky for Ukraine's defeat in the Russia-Ukraine war, and even consider removing him from office, but it is uncertain whether he will be "physically eliminated" or deported.
Larry Johnson also mentioned that in the future, the White House may prioritize having Zalu, the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, take Zelensky's place. Although this is only a possibility, among the public in the West, this opinion clearly reveals the discontent of the United States and the West with Ukraine**.
European Union. Moreover, from a geopolitical point of view, the current differences between Ukraine and the West, if they continue to expand the scope of attacks on Russia, may lead to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine getting out of control again.
The implication is that Russia is likely to retaliate more strongly against Ukraine. More critically, Ukraine still has the ability to attack Russia at any time, which further confirms that the security buffer that Putin is looking for for Russia is still insufficient.
This suggests that Russia may not only control the four eastern regions of Ukraine, but if Ukraine continues to launch attacks on Russian civilian targets, then the Russian army will basically have to continue to advance westward.
It is indisputable that this is highly likely to trigger a new round of large-scale military operations, forcing Europe and the United States to re-intensify aid to Ukraine, and possibly even plunging directly into the conflict.
The main leaders of the United States and Ukraine.
From a certain point of view, what Zelensky is doing so far is actually to bind the stability of the whole of Europe and ensure that its fight with Russia will not be interrupted. It is clear that this is a huge risk and that the global community, and Europe in particular, must find ways to stop this risky behavior in Ukraine, otherwise the consequences will be catastrophic.
Gossip entertainment star