Since the new roundIsraeli-Palestinian conflictAfter the outbreak, the United States has been staunchly supportive of Israel, but recentlyU.S. Secretary of StateBlinken's statement has taken a different turn. In Blinken vs. Israel**HerzogDuring talks with Israel's wartime cabinet, he warned Israel that it must complete its plan to destroy Hamas in weeks, not months. Previously, the United States had chosen to unconditionally support Israel, and now it is asking for a shorteningMilitarytime for action, and emphasisInternationalSociety will exert tremendous pressure on this. This distinction may be made so that Israel can achieve its desired goals in this round of conflict.
Expanding: The sudden 180-degree change in the attitude of the United States has attracted global attention. Previously, the United States had unconditionally supported Israel, inIsraeli-Palestinian conflictshowed a strong supportive stance. Secretary Blinken's recent statements, however, are somewhat different. In his meetings with Israel** and cabinet members, he explicitly warned Israel that it must speed up its actions and restrictionsMilitarytime of action to avoid prolonged high-intensity conflicts. And, he also emphasizedInternationalSociety will exert tremendous pressure on Israel. This change in attitude has caused people to wonder and think, it may be that the United States hopes that Israel will achieve its strategic goals in a shorter period of time, reduce the duration of the conflict, and lowerInternationalCritical voices in society against Israel.
According to Palestinian television, Israel decided to resume military strikes against Hamas two hours after the temporary ceasefire agreement expired. Israeli fighters immediately onGaza StripAt least 14 Palestinians were killed and dozens injured as a result of airstrikes in the south. Hamas, for its part, said it had engaged in lengthy negotiations with Israel before the ceasefire expired, but all proposals were rejected by Israel. From this it can be seen that the Israeli military wants to continue to fight Hamas, restarting the pairGaza StripofMilitaryLet's go.
Expanding: Aware of the ephemeral nature of the temporary ceasefire agreement, Israel made the decision to reinstate HamasMilitaryHit. Shortly after the ceasefire expired, the Israeli military moved quickly to send warplanes against it, according to Palestinian televisionGaza StripAir strikes were carried out in the south. The airstrike caused Palestinians, including 14 dead and dozens injured. Hamas revealed that the two sides had held lengthy negotiations before the ceasefire agreement expired, but the Israeli side did not accept any proposals. This shows that the Israeli military is determined to continue to fight Hamas, to continue to fightGaza StripConductedMilitaryaction to achieve their strategic goals.
The U.S. Department of Defense announced in early November that the U.S. was in the U.SMiddle EastOne of the four key objectives is to "strengthen the military posture in the region and prevent any country or non-state from escalating the crisis to."Gazaoutside of the region". This means that the United States wants to avoid interference by other countriesIsraeli-Palestinian conflict, especially to preventMiddle EastThe state is involved. This also explains why the United States is pressuring Israel to shorten itMilitaryTime for action. However, this statement contradicts the position of unconditional support for Israel in the past, and may be aimed at hammering and warning Israel to protect its own interests.
Expanded: According to the US Department of DefenseMiddle EastOne of the four key objectives, the U.S. goal is to strengthen the military posture in the region and prevent any country or non-state from escalating the crisis toGazaoutside of the region". Behind this goal is that the United States wants to avoidMiddle EastOther countries interveneIsraeli-Palestinian conflict, in particular, to prevent the situation from escalating into a large-scale war. However,U.S. Secretary of StateBlinken's statement contradicts previous positions, which may have been intended to warn Israel and othersMiddle Eaststate, avoid a long oneMilitaryconflict and protect their own interests. In this case, the statements of the United States are actually for protectionMiddle Eaststability of the region and avoid the risk of its own involvement in conflict.
In response to Blinken's statement, Israel will heed the warning and complete it in a few weeksMilitaryWhat about action?This is still an unknown. Israel's choice will have a significant impact on future development trends. Whether or not Israel is able to achieve its goals within the allotted time, the conflict has caused a serious humanitarian crisis. According to statistics, as of early November, the conflict had resulted in the deaths of thousands of Palestinian civilians, including a large number of children and women, as well as a large number of themGazaCivilians are displaced. This causedInternationalStrong dissatisfaction and criticism of Israel in society. If Israel continues to extendMilitaryThe time of action may exacerbate the humanitarian crisis andInternational** Pressure. Therefore, whether Israel heeded the warning and completed it in a limited timeMilitaryactions will determine its future development trends. In any case, the outcome of this round of conflict will soon be revealed.