Title: Street Fighting Manslaughter of the White Flag Brothers!The Israeli army's mood is revealed, why did the battlefield fall to the blood and tears of compatriots?
Street fighting accidentally kills the White Flag brothers!The Israeli army's mood is revealed, why did the battlefield fall to the blood and tears of compatriots?
Hello everyone and welcome to my blog!Recently, there was a news piece about the fighting of the Israeli army in northern Gaza that caught my attention and made me deeply shocked and thought. In this battle, Israeli soldiers mistakenly killed three Israeli Jews holding white flags for help. Today, I will analyze this incident in depth and lead you through the competition from the perspective of military international relations.
Accidental injury. On 15 December, a tragic incidental wounding occurred on the battlefields in northern Gaza. In the midst of fierce street fighting, a squad of Israeli soldiers suddenly spotted three figures with white flags raised in a state of high nervousness, and they were anxious to call for help. However, by mistakenly believing that the three men were Hamas fighters, the soldiers** without thinking** resulted in two people being killed on the spot and another injured after fleeing back to the building.
Behind this tragedy is the psychological pressure faced by the Israeli army in a complex environment such as guerrilla warfare and tunnel warfare. Hamas's nimble tactics have put Israeli soldiers in a state of panic, accompanied by a high level of vigilance against anyone and any situation.
Psychological dilemmas. This incident reflects the psychological predicament of Israeli soldiers. Once in the Gaza Strip, they had to face a series of complex decisions, one of which was how to make the right decisions without being able to confirm the identity of the other party. The mindset instilled in the training seems to be that if you can't confirm that the other side is a friendly force, then you should treat it as an enemy and act quickly.
Three-light policy. 
I was deeply shocked by the article's reference to the "three-light policy" implemented by the Israeli army, that is, killing, looting, and blowing up. This tactic of indiscriminate bombing makes accidental injuries and accidental killings inevitable. Israel's goal is to eliminate the living forces on the ground, and both Hamas and civilians could be targeted. This kind of military action strategy makes me wonder whether it is for security or has it exceeded the bottom line of morality
The threat of guerrilla warfare.
Asymmetric warfare such as guerrilla warfare and tunnel warfare in Gaza poses an unprecedented threat to Israel. Hamas's tactical flexibility, interspersed with civilians, makes it difficult for the Israeli army to distinguish between friend and foe. This also makes soldiers feel a potential threat from all sides on the battlefield, which in turn affects their judgment and actions.
Attitude to military operations.
In this battle, the actions of the Israeli army are food for thought. Do they need to revisit the guidance in training to ease the psychological burden on soldiers and improve their ability to recognize friendly soldiers and civilians?On the other hand, we must question the ethics and morality of the implementation of the "three-light policy" in military operations, and whether this is in line with the principles of international law and humanitarianism
Epilogue. Through this incident, we are deeply aware of the tremendous impact of the complex war environment on the military and soldiers. In this process, there is not only the accumulation of psychological pressure, but also the challenge to the bottom line of ethics. As an international relations blogger, I hope that through this article, I will draw everyone's attention to military operations, and call on more people to care about the human plight behind the war and strive for the road to peace.
Let us all think about whether we can find a more humane and peaceful way to resolve conflicts in this world. Thank you for reading, and we look forward to your views and discussions.