In the administrative arena, some new leaders face a traditional dilemma: whether to take care of the unfinished business left by their predecessors. This problem, which is known as "new officials ignoring old accounts," actually reflects the concept of political achievements of some leaders who have not carried out thorough reforms.
First of all, this phenomenon reveals the short-term utilitarian mentality of some leading cadres, especially the mentality of expecting to quickly establish political achievements by launching large-scale projects. They often reluctantly push forward the implementation of projects regardless of whether the actual conditions are ripe, so as to please their superiors and add luster to their personal careers. They ignore the fact that once a project is launched, not only can it default on huge debts, but it can also cause endless problems down the road.
Secondly, this phenomenon also reflects the attitude of some extreme lack of responsibility. They believe that the debts left by their predecessors have nothing to do with them and should not be dealt with by lowering their status. They worry that the drudgery of cleaning up the legacy of their predecessors will not be profitable and consume valuable time and energy. There is also a ** promotion to the top because of the debts of the predecessor, and the psychology of imitation has arisen. Under this unwritten rule, given the short nature of their political careers, many new ** will choose to circumvent this chaotic situation.
The scenario of "new officials ignoring old accounts" will harm the rights and interests of investors, weaken the investment confidence of enterprises, and at the same time, reduce the credibility of the company, corrupt the local business atmosphere, and hinder the sustainable and healthy development of the economy. This behavior hurts the heart of the enterprise, loses the face of the people, and may harm the blessings of the people.
For the public, the preferred way to deal with the remaining problems is to resort to higher authorities. If it is the inaction of the administrative department, you can file a complaint with ** first. At the same time, the role of ** should not be underestimated, ** has become a powerful ** for social justice and transparency**. With the continuous attention and reporting, the injustice has been exposed, which has aroused public attention and discussion, prompting the functional departments to take measures to restore social justice. The intervention of ** can also strengthen the public's understanding of the work of **, and implement the citizens' right to know and supervise with the times.