Recently, one happened on the streets of GuangzhouTraffic accidentsIt has aroused widespread public attention. In this accident, aMercedesThe car forcibly changed lanes and scraped with other vehicles, and the traffic police judgedMercedesAfter the woman took full responsibility, she was very dissatisfied. MercedesThe woman argued with the traffic police and could not convince the traffic police to change the verdict. Eventually, she even moved out of the housePoliceHusband, claiming that he is from the Public Security BureauPolice。This approach is incredible, and people can't help but sigh at the professionalism and patience of the traffic police. So,MercedesWhy is the woman so adamant that she is not responsible? Behind youPoliceHusband for processingTraffic accidentsWhat does it do? This article will analyze and discuss this.
In this accident,MercedesThe woman forcibly changed lanes and scraped with other vehicles, and the traffic police ruled that she was fully responsible in accordance with the law. However, she considered this judgment unreasonable and made a theoretical refutation of the traffic police. She questioned under which regulation the traffic police imposed the punishment, insisting that her full responsibility was not established. The traffic police patiently explained, emphasizing that regardless of whether she collided with other vehicles or not, forcibly changing lanes was itself an illegal act. However,MercedesThe woman is unmoved and insists that she is a victim.
As can be seen from this strife,MercedesFemale pairTransportationThere is a misunderstanding of the rules and lane change regulations. In her cognition, changing lanes while driving is a legal act of the driver and should not be held responsible. However,TransportationThe regulations clearly state that it is important to ensure safety when changing lanes to avoid repercussions and hazards to other vehicles. Therefore,MercedesThere is a certain deviation in the woman's cognition, which leads her to disagree with the judgment of the traffic police.
In the face of the traffic police's explanation and insistence,MercedesThe woman still couldn't accept it. She even put her ownPoliceThe husband moved out, claiming that he was from the Public Security BureauPolice, and asked the traffic police to let her husband handle the matter. The move provoked a backlash from the public, who believed that she was using her connections and power to solve problems, regardless of the principles of fairness and justice.
So,PoliceHusband for processingTraffic accidentsWhat does it do? First of all,PoliceThe husband does not mean that he is rightTransportationDeeper knowledge and expertise in regulations and incident handling. Traffic accidentsDispositions shall be carried out in accordance with laws and regulations, and cannot be relied uponKinshipor the power to interfere and change the outcome of the penalty. Secondly,Traffic accidentsThe handling is within the responsibility of the traffic police department and should not be interfered with by others. PoliceThe husband's intervention will only disrupt the order of fair law enforcement and weaken the authority of the traffic policeCredibility
MercedesAs the culprit in the accident, the woman has always refused to admit her mistake and pursued her own rights and interests. Not only did she not accept the traffic police's verdict, but she also demanded that surveillance be obtained to prove that she was not responsible. Where does the courage and audacity behind this come from?
On the one hand,MercedesThe woman may be confident based on her own driving skills. She probably thinks she's good at driving and has no problem with maneuvers like changing lanes. However, she neglected the impact on other vehicles and the risk assessment when changing lanes. On the other hand, she may have someone behind her to support and escort. She is confident and bold to act and pursue her own rights, which may be backed by her background and network resources. However, this over-reliance on the power of connections behind it, is not conducive toEthicsBehavior andSocialFairness and justice.
Through the analysis of this accident, we can see:MercedesThe woman's misunderstanding of the lane change rules and her disagreement with the traffic police law enforcement. She tried to move out by moving outPoliceThe husband came to change the verdict, but he didn't succeed. This incident highlights the rule of lawSocialThe importance of universal applicability and fair execution for citizens. In any case, we should complyTransportationregulations andEthicsprinciples, do not rely on the connections and power behind them, pursue fairness and justice, and jointly build harmonySocial