Now global warming, air pollution, has become a consensus, and this is a consensus without any controversy.
Therefore, the control of pollution, of course, must start with those that are not necessary for life and have little impact on people's livelihood after the ban. For example, fireworks are banned.
Of course, cars, factories and even cooking fires will be polluted, but these aspects are related to people's livelihood and well-being, and they cannot be banned, or even restricted, once banned and restricted, it will greatly affect people's quality of life.
Fireworks are different, fireworks are traditional at best. Compared with people's livelihood, tradition may not be so important. In addition, women wrap their little feet, and men have three wives and four concubines, is it also a tradition?So we don't have to carry all the traditions on our backs.
Banning fireworks and firecrackers, on the one hand, can greatly reduce air pollution, on the other hand, it will not substantially reduce people's quality of life, but will reduce the injuries and disabilities caused by fireworks and firecrackers, give people a clean sky, and greatly reduce social costs.
So there is no comparison between fireworks pollution and car pollution. If you had to choose between a ban on cars and a ban on fireworks, I think most people would choose the latter.
The sky belongs to us as a person, but it is also for future generations, and we cannot try to leave a hazy sky for future generations.
We can't afford not to drive, not to eat, not to develop the economy. But we can at least do it without fireworks. Even if we only do a little bit, it is the best gift for future generations.