In 1961, when Marshal Montgomery of Britain visited China, he said: "Among my comrades-in-arms, there is one person who is most capable of leading troops to fight, and this person is called Su Yu." ”
Background and Battle.
In June 1946, the 120,000-strong army of the Kuomintang reactionaries attempted to seize land and sea transportation channels and launched an attack on our army. ** The Military Commission planned to use the troops in the liberated areas of Shandong and Taihang as the main force to attack the Kuomintang troops on the "outer front". At the same time, Su Yu of the Central China Field Army put forward the bold idea of "hitting a stone with an egg."
Su Yu's courage and experience.
Su Yu has been a senior commander of our army since the Red Army period and is good at various tactics. During the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, he led his troops to fight in the area of Tianmu Mountain, and deeply experienced the pressure of being far away from the base area. This experience allowed him to discover the advantages of relying on the base to fight sports warfare.
The special idea of the Central China Field Army.
There are two main reasons why Su Yu proposed the strategy of "fighting a few battles on the inside first, and then turning to the outside line". First of all, the international community does not support the Chinese civil war, and our military needs to be cautious. Second, our army has established base areas in the Soviet-central region, which has a mass base, which is conducive to the acquisition of troops, food, and intelligence.
The miracle of the Soviet-Chinese campaign.
The Soviet-Chinese Campaign lasted one and a half months from July 13 to August 31, 1946, and the "Seven Battles and Seven Victories" created a miracle in modern military history. Su Yu adopted the tactics of long-distance running and attacking the west, winning big with a small victory, and achieving a ratio of 15:1 between the enemy and the enemy.
Su Yu's art of conducting.
Su Yu demonstrated textbook tactics in the Soviet-Chinese campaign. On many occasions, he adopted the strategy of running long distances and attacking the east and west, concentrating his forces to strike at the enemy's weak points. Su Yu's command and dispatch ability reversed the disadvantage, so that our army fought more and less, and reduced the number of people.
The impact of victory.
Due to the "seven battles and seven victories" of the Soviet-Chinese campaign, Su Yu attracted the attention of *** and went to the peak of his military career. In the later Huaihai Campaign, Su Yu's command was even more superb, winning more with less, creating a miracle of war.
** The weight and responsibility of the instrument.
After the Soviet-Chinese campaign, Su Yu won the most important thing. In September 1946, the Shandong Field Army and the Central China Field Army were merged into one to establish the East China Field Army Command. ** The specific operational command was handed over to Su Yu, and our army's operations in the War of Liberation also drew on the experience of the Soviet-Chinese campaign.
Epilogue. 
The 30,000 poorly equipped Central China Field Army, under the leadership of Su Yu, attacked like the wind and was unstoppable. The success of the Soviet-Chinese campaign was not only due to Su Yu's brilliant command, but also to the experience accumulated by our army in relying on base areas to fight mobile warfare in the War of Resistance Against Japan. This battle not only changed the fate of Su Yu, but also left a strong mark in the history of our army.
This article details the amazing performance of the Central China Field Army in the Soviet-Chinese campaign, as well as Su Yu's outstanding command talent in it. Through vivid descriptions, the article shows Su Yu's bold idea of "hitting a stone with an egg" in the face of fierce warfare, and explains the profound strategic considerations behind it. The highlights of this article will be commented on below.
First of all, the article cleverly begins by quoting Marshal Montgomery's comments during his visit to China, laying down the reader's expectations for Su Yu's outstanding military talent. This opening not only arouses the reader's curiosity, but also provides an introduction to the subsequent narrative.
Secondly, through a detailed description of the battle situation, the article vividly shows the threat of the 120,000 Kuomintang reactionaries to our army at that time, and presents the urgency of the war to the readers. Then, Su Yu's strategic idea of "hitting the stone with an egg" raises questions and provides the necessary foreshadowing for subsequent explanations.
The article goes on to reveal the wealth of experience behind Su Yu, especially his combat experience in the War of Resistance Against Japan. These experiences made Su Yu realize the advantages of relying on base areas to fight mobile warfare, and then put forward the strategy of "fighting a few battles on the inner line first, and then turning to the outer front," which won our army time and the initiative.
At the climax of the battle, the article vividly described the seven battles and seven victories of the Central Chinese Field Army in the Soviet-Chinese Campaign, as well as the tactics adopted by Su Yu to attack the east and the west. These depictions show Su Yu's superb command art on the battlefield, which is impressive.
Finally, the article emphasizes that Su Yu was valued for his outstanding performance in the Soviet-Chinese campaign and handed over specific operational command to him. This laid the foundation for Su Yu's victory again in the Huaihai Campaign, and also expressed his keen vision for military talents.
Overall, this review has a full and in-depth excavation of the highlights in the article. Through detailed examples and vivid descriptions, readers have a deeper understanding of Su Yu's outstanding performance in the Soviet-Chinese campaign, and also have a clearer understanding of the decision-making and military command vision.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!