Since its establishment, the China Judgments Network has been attracting much attention. As an open platform for the adjudication work of the courts across the country, it provides a window for the public to understand the judicial adjudication process and supervise the work of the courts. However, with the development of the Internet, the issue of the retention of the judgment document network has gradually surfaced.
First, let's take a look at the advantages of the Judgment Network.
It facilitates public access to case information and helps the public to understand the judicial process, thereby enhancing the supervision of the work of the courts. At the same time, it also provides a wealth of case materials for legal research, which is helpful to promote the development of legal research and judicial practice.
However, there are also some problems with the Judgments Network.
First of all, due to the large number of public judgment documents, the public needs to spend a lot of time and energy when accessing them.
Secondly, some cases involving personal privacy and trade secrets have also been made public, which has brought certain distress to the parties.
In addition, the quality of some adjudication documents is uneven, and there are even errors and irregularities.
So, how should we look at the issue of the departure and retention of the judgment document network?
On the one hand, the open judicial trial process is an important means of supervising the work of the courts, which is conducive to enhancing the credibility of the judiciary
On the other hand, we need to make reasonable adjustments to the scope and method of disclosure to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties.
Therefore, we should improve and perfect the network of judgment documents on the basis of retaining it.
Specifically, we can do the following:
The first is to strengthen the review and standardization of judgment documents and improve the quality of documents;
The second is to reasonably set the scope of disclosure to avoid cases involving sensitive information such as personal privacy and commercial secrets being disclosed;
The third is to provide more convenient query and retrieval functions to facilitate public access.
At the same time, we also need to recognize that the Judgment Document Network is only a means of supervising the work of the courts, and cannot be overly relied upon. We need to strengthen supervision over the work of the courts through a variety of channels, such as supervision, social supervision, etc. Only in this way can judicial fairness and credibility be better guaranteed.
In short, the existence of the China Judgments Network is necessary, but it also needs to be continuously improved and perfected. On the basis of reservations, we should make reasonable adjustments and optimizations to make them better serve the public and judicial work. At the same time, we also need to strengthen supervision over the work of the courts through various channels to jointly safeguard social fairness and justice.
This article was originally published by Yueming Su Guang Nuan in Baijiahao, **Please indicate!Thank you for liking, and I wish to use the plain light of the moonYou get married, give you warmth!
The closure of the judgment document website has sparked controversy