Among the five good generals of Cao Wei, Yu Ban had made great achievements, but he was humiliated by surrendering to Guan Yu. Why did this Cao Cao's confidant go to a dead end under Cao Pi?The reasons for this involve the influence of the ban on surrender, Cao Pi's narrow-mindedness, and the recognition of Pound. This article will analyze this history in depth and restore why Cao Pi made such a decisive decision to ban it.
Yu Ban's surrender had a bad impact.
Yu Ban surrendered to Guan Yu, and his actions had a very bad impact on Cao Wei's military morale. As a senior general under Cao Cao, Yu Ban held important positions such as General Zuo and enjoyed the power of fake Jieyue. In contrast, the treatment of other generals such as Zhang Liao, Zhang He, Xu Huang, and Le Jin was limited to the fake festival, and the big difference made Yu Ban unique among the five generals of Cao Wei. However, his act of surrender undoubtedly shook the hearts of Cao Wei's army and made it difficult for Cao Pi to tolerate. When Guan Yu besieged Xiangfan, Cao Cao urgently sent Yu Ban to the rescue, but Yu Ban chose to surrender, causing the entire army to be annihilated. Cao Pi was overwhelmed by this and became suspicious of Ban's infidelity, which led to his humiliation and death.
Cao Pi's narrow-mindedness became a decision-making factor.
Compared with his father Cao Cao, Cao Pi was narrow-minded and could not tolerate others. When Cao Pi was young, he attempted to borrow money from Cao Hong, which led to resentment towards Cao Hong. Later, when Cao Hong was imprisoned and faced execution because of Cao Pi's dissatisfaction, Cao Pi's narrow-mindedness was once again revealed. Bao Xin was Cao Cao's benefactor, and his son Bao Xun was executed for offending Cao Pi. This shows that Cao Pi can be ruthless to his relatives and benefactors, and his heart is incomprehensible. In this narrow-minded situation, Yu Ban's surrender became a betrayal that Cao Pi could not tolerate, prompting him to make the decision to humiliate Yu Ban.
Cao Pi humiliated the deep consideration of the ban.
Cao Pi's decision was not just a momentary impulse, but also a warning to other generals. Cao Pi gave Pang De's family a high reward and gave Pang De the nickname of Marquis Zhuang in recognition of his loyalty. This shows that Cao Pi did not lack recognition of his loyal subjects, but was extremely intolerant of the surrender of the enemy. The practice of humiliating Yu Ban is actually to warn Cao Wei's other generals that once they betray, they will face not only death, but also the misfortune of their families. Cao Pi's deep consideration made the tragedy of Yu Ban a mirror of Cao Wei's army, further consolidating the stability of military discipline and rule.
Epilogue. 
Under Cao Pi's rule, Yu Ban was humiliated because he surrendered to Guan Yu and finally went to a dead end. Cao Pi's narrow-mindedness, intolerance of surrender, and praise for Pound contributed to this tragedy. However, it also reflects the military discipline and high expectations of loyal ministers during the Cao Wei period. Yu Ban's fate became a part of history, and at the same time, it also sounded a grim alarm for future generations about loyalty and betrayal.
Cao Pi and Yu Ban: The Game of Loyalty and Betrayal.
This article deeply analyzes the contradiction between Cao Pi and Yu Ban and the reasons why Cao Pi finally chose to humiliate Yu Ban. First of all, the article details the bad influence of Yu Ban's surrender to Guan Yu, especially emphasizing the particularity of his position among the five good generals of Cao Wei. This made it difficult for Cao Pi to tolerate the betrayal in the face of the ban, so he made a humiliating decision. This analysis focuses on the causes of historical events, giving the reader a clearer understanding of the forbidden behavior and Cao Pi's reaction.
Secondly, the article's discussion of Cao Pi's narrow-mindedness makes the reader more aware of the character traits of this emperor. By comparing with Cao Cao, Cao Pi seems to be grudgeful and narrow-minded, and he can show no mercy to family members or benefactors. Such a character trait made it even more difficult for him to accept Yu Ban's betrayal, which eventually led to Yu Ban's tragic end. Through this, the author skillfully reveals the deep-seated reasons for the contradiction between Cao Pi and Yu Ban.
Further, the article interprets the deep consideration of Cao Pi's humiliation and ban, arguing that this decision is not only an outlet for personal feelings, but also a warning for military discipline and expectations for loyal ministers. Through the commendation of Pound and the high reward to Pound's family, Cao Pi showed the importance of his loyal ministers. However, for the generals who surrendered, Cao Pi adopted more severe measures to demonstrate deterrence. This kind of in-depth thinking makes the article more profound in the psychological analysis of historical figures.
Finally, the concluding part of the article cleverly summarizes the contradiction between Cao Pi and Yu Ban, emphasizing the historical evaluation of this story. Through a review of forbidden fate, the article calls on readers to consider the complex relationship between loyalty and betrayal. Such an ending not only makes the reader have a deeper reflection on historical events, but also points out the main purpose of the article.
Overall, this commentary** fully interprets and analyzes the original text, focusing not only on the specific causes of historical events, but also on the character and psychological aspects of the characters. Through in-depth excavation of the dispute between Ban and Cao Pi, the article successfully sketches a political and military map of the Cao Wei period, providing readers with profound historical enlightenment.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!