Wen Tiejun pointed out that in the infrastructure construction of some cities in China, there is a significant waste problem, taking the transformation of the road teeth as an example, often in the first half of the year just laid cement pavement, and in the second half of the year it was replaced with stone strips, this frequent change of the situation has triggered a deep reflection on the society. It is widely noted that in the construction and maintenance of sidewalks, even if the floor tiles are only slightly upturned and not damaged, they are still completely replaced, and this unsparing attitude towards public resources is painful. It is undoubtedly a huge waste to completely renew the entire floor tile because of the tiny defects of a few bricks, and these funds are derived from the hard work of the people.
He stressed that although improving the quality of the urban environment is a positive measure, given that the actual income level of the people is not high, every expenditure should be treated with caution and must not be squandered arbitrarily. His views are simple and straightforward, and truly reflect the aspirations of the broad masses of the people. For those who are keen to build landmark buildings on a large scale, but frequently demolish and rebuild, the phenomenon is even more thought-provoking. In fact, waste in urban infrastructure construction is far more than just a case of road-topping, but is widespread and endless. We have to wonder why reconstructions are always carried out in a comprehensive manner rather than in a partial wayWhy do you have to replace the whole thing when you only need to fix a few minor problems?
This excessive waste is incomprehensible, and can't we deal with it in a more eco-friendly way?In the case of the road, for example, it is perfectly possible to repair the upturned floor tiles rather than hastily demolishing the entire floor. In the long run, this economical approach not only reduces resource consumption, but also contributes to environmental protection.
At the same time, the problem of waste in urban infrastructure construction has also prompted people to reflect on the deep-seated problems of urban management. In the planning and design phase, did we take into account the actual situation?Are we neglecting their practicality and long-term economic benefits in our pursuit of spectacular landmarks?Urban construction should be based on actual needs and respect public opinion, rather than blindly pursuing a superficial prosperity and strong image.
Only in this way can urban construction be closer to the people's living needs and effectively improve people's quality of life. Wen Tiejun's views have stimulated the attention of all sectors of society to the problem of waste in urban infrastructure construction. In addition to the examples of road teeth, waste phenomena such as frequent replacement of green vegetation in parks and excessive maintenance of municipal facilities also abound. These are not only a waste of financial funds, but also a waste of precious resources.
Therefore, we must face up to this phenomenon and advocate the concept of urban construction that is economical and environmentally friendly, so as to ensure that every penny of expenditure is effectively used. In summary, Wen Tiejun's views arouse people's attention to the problem of waste in urban infrastructure construction. We should deeply reflect on the problems of urban management, pay attention to actual needs, and promote the concept of urban construction that is economical and environmentally friendly.
Only in this way can our cities become better, better serve their people and improve their quality of life. Let's work together to contribute wisdom and strength to building a more livable urban environment!
Wen Tiejun