Zhu Ling s case against Sun Wei s statement A powerful analysis of a professional lawyer!

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-01-31

Recently, an article on Zhu Ling's case has attracted widespread attention, and the author of the article introduced himself as a veteran lawyer who has practiced for 20 years, has rich experience in civil and commercial cases related to marriage and family, and has participated in legal aid in death penalty cases. He made an in-depth analysis of Sun Wei's case and pointed out many key issues, which made people think deeply.

The lawyer first mentioned that he had followed and tracked the Zhu Ling incident for a long time, and analyzed Sun Wei's statement in Tianya. In the article, he pointed out that there were many problems with Sun Wei's statement, one of the important being that Sun Wei avoided the word poisoning and did not mention it at all. In response, the lawyer questioned why Sun Wei was so sensitive to the word poisoning, and why she deliberately avoided this key point in her statement. He believes that Sun Wei's rhetoric shows a tendency to try to cover up the truth and create a false image.

In the article, the lawyer analyzes Sun Wei's mindset in detail. He pointed out that Sun Wei's characterization of the case as a "poisoning case" rather than a poisoning case in the statement showed her evasion of the poisoning charge. According to the lawyer, this mindset suggests that Sun Wei may be directly involved in the poisoning case. He further noted that Sun Wei's emphasis on the scene of the poisoning in the dormitory in his statement and his attempt to shift his gaze to places that had nothing to do with her reflected a mindset peculiar to the poisoner.

The lawyer questioned the tacit understanding and solidarity between Sun Wei's roommates. He believes that this high level of unity may be due to the fact that the roommates share some kind of interest, not because of good character. He stressed that in the eyes of those who have been wronged, everyone is a suspect, but Sun Wei's roommates do not suspect each other, probably because they know exactly who the real poisoner is.

The lawyer further pointed out that in Sun Wei's statement, she avoided talking about the fact that Zhu Ling was poisoned and avoided the core issue. He believes that this is similar to the behavior of the defendant in some first-instance death penalty cases, and once the key issue is involved, the defendant will get stuck. This has led lawyers to question Sun's true motives.

As for Sun Wei's motives, the lawyer put forward his own opinions. He pointed out that Sun Wei may have developed a strong dissatisfaction with Zhu Ling's lifestyle, especially Zhu Ling's habit of leaving early and returning late. He believes that this dissatisfaction may have been one of the motives for Sun Wei's involvement in the case. At the same time, the lawyer is also wary of Sun Wei's strong defense of motives, believing that it is related to her avoidance and forgetfulness of the truth.

In the article, the lawyer questioned Sun's emphasis on motives. He believes that Sun Wei's overemphasis on her lack of motivation may be due to her unconscious feelings of jealousy or resentment in her heart. He further analyzes Sun Wei's mindset in terms of motives, arguing that she is only trying to change the nature of the incident, rather than actually finding the real culprit, which shows her avoidance of the truth.

In the article, the lawyer talked about Sun Wei's emphasis on evidence. He pointed out that Sun Wei has repeatedly emphasized that there is no proof without evidence, and this is the unique thinking pattern of the poisoner. The poisoner is most concerned with the evidence of whether he has been caught, not the facts themselves. According to the lawyer, Sun Wei's emphasis on evidence is a defense of his innocence, rather than a pursuit of the truth.

Finally, the lawyer expressed his pursuit of the truth of Sun Wei's case and his belief in justice against the background of his personal experience of legal aid in death penalty cases. He stressed that the law may not be able to convict Sun Wei, but the public has the right to analyze and question the case. He called on people to keep an eye on the truth, pursue justice, and hope that the truth will one day be revealed to the world.

This article analyzes the many problems of Sun Wei's case in simple terms in vivid and interesting language, highlighting the author's adherence to law and justice. Through in-depth thinking and analysis of the case, the article triggers readers' thinking about Sun Wei's case, arousing the pursuit of truth and the desire for justice.

Related Pages