The daughter buys a mansion, and the father transfers 2400 million!The ex-wife's creditor knocked on the door and demanded a refund1200 million!A man in Shenzhen wanted to give his daughter a good life, but he didn't expect to cause a lawsuit!It turned out that when he divorced his ex-wife, he did not divide the property, and the ex-wife owed a large debt!When the creditor found out about the transfer record he gave to his daughter, he and his daughter sued him and his daughter in court, believing that it was the joint property of the husband and wife, and demanded that the daughter return half of the purchase price!After the court trial, the judgment was in favor of the creditor, and the daughter had to sell the mansion and pay back the creditor!
Mr. Hui and Ms. Ho, both successful entrepreneurs and close friends of Ms. Wong, are successful businessmen. In 2014, someone wanted to borrow a sum of money from Ms. Huang through Ms. Ho for emergency purposes, but Ms. Huang was hesitant at first due to the large amount. Under Ms. Ho's persuasion, she finally agreed to be the guarantor.
The borrower failed to repay the loan on time, resulting in Ms. Wong falling into a debt dispute. According to the law, Ms. Ho, as the guarantor, is jointly and severally liable for the debt. The court upheld Ms. Huang's lawsuit, but since Ms. Ho had divorced Mr. Xu, the execution could only be traced back to the property in Ms. Ho's name.
In order to recover the arrears, Ms. Huang worked hard to collect information about Ms. Ho's property and accidentally discovered a key piece of information. In the following year, when Ms. He and Mr. Xu were still divorced, Mr. Xu transferred money to his daughter Ms. Xu to purchase a luxury house, with a transfer amount of up to 24.42 million yuan.
In court, Ms. Wong asserted that the money was part of the joint property of the husband and wife and that although it was not used for the joint debts of the husband and wife, she argued that Mr Xu had no right to dispose of Ms. Ho's share. Mr. Xu argued that the transfer was a gift from his former father-in-law to his daughter for the purchase of a house and was not part of the joint property of the husband and wife. The court held that Mr. Hui had failed to provide evidence to prove the nature of the gift, and therefore determined that it was the joint property of the husband and wife.
In the end, the court upheld Ms. Huang's right of revocation and ordered Ms. Xu to return 12.21 million yuan to her mother, Ms. He. Some netizens speculated that the money was actually the joint property of the husband and wife, and they deliberately transferred it in the name of their father-in-law and mother-in-law, possibly to avoid legal responsibility. What are your thoughts on this?