Text: Yu Minghui.
According to a report by workers, recently, an employee of a car company posted on social media, saying that almost 80% of the employees within the company have been explicitly hinted that if they want to keep their jobs and be promoted, they must buy cars produced by their own companies. As a technician, he not only bought two cars himself, but also recommended relatives and friends to buy them, but he was still laid off in the end. Benefits, employee rates, apportionments, explicit purchases, ......How can a variety of "in-house purchases" benefit multiple parties?
Objectively speaking, there is no original sin in the "internal purchase" of enterprises, and even if it is done properly, the benefits outweigh the disadvantages. It can promote corporate culture and values, enrich employee benefits, stimulate internal sales, help enhance employee engagement, and promote employees to become product promoters, and collect and propose product improvement suggestions faster through trials.
However, if the proportion is not grasped well, the "internal purchase" of the enterprise will become "forced purchase", I am afraid that it will bring unnecessary troubles and losses to employees. Enterprises must have a clear sense of boundaries when implementing the "in-house purchase" policy.
It is necessary to clarify the purpose and scope of "in-app purchase". The original intention of engaging in "in-app purchases" is to increase employee loyalty and a sense of belonging, while promoting internal sales and product improvements. Therefore, when formulating an "in-app purchase" plan, enterprises need to clarify its purpose and scope. For example, it is necessary to make it clear that the object of "internal purchase" is a specific group of people such as employees and their families, and the scope cannot be expanded at willIt is necessary to clarify the restrictions on "in-app purchases", such as quantity, time, etc., to ensure that they are fair, just and transparent. Finally, it is necessary to clarify the purchase process and regulations of "internal purchase" to avoid unnecessary chaos.
Respect the wishes and choices of employees. When implementing the "in-house purchase" policy, enterprises need to respect the wishes and choices of employees, as well as the usefulness and complete voluntariness of employees' purchases of goods, etc., and cannot force employees to "make in-house purchases". If employees are unwilling to participate in "in-app purchases", the company should respect the employee's decision and give corresponding explanations and explanations.
Of course, no matter how good the system is, it is often not enough to rely on the internal consciousness of the enterprise, and strong external supervision is still needed. This requires that labor supervision, market supervision, taxation and other departments should timely and effectively intervene and supervise from the perspectives of employees' labor rights and interests and market health order to ensure that the "internal purchase" of enterprises is implemented and implemented within the scope of compliance. Only in this way can the "in-house purchase" policy truly achieve the goal of benefiting multiple parties.