The Palestinian-Israeli conflict has escalated again, attracting worldwide attention. UN Secretary-General António Guterres deeply felt the international community's condemnation of Israel and condemned Israel's actions, and finally the United Nations decided to demand a ceasefire and negotiations with Israel in accordance with the provisions of the Charter. However, Israel was spared by a veto by the United States, which is behind it. The Israeli minister even issued a long article thanking the United States for its vote, which further proves the ambition of the United States and Israel to use war to stir up the situation in the Middle East. However, this situation lasted less than 72 hours, and at the request of many countries**, Guterres urgently convened a special session, and in the end, more than 150 countries voted in favor of the resolution calling for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. Although the United States voted against, it did not use a veto, which caused some discussion.
Expansion: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has attracted widespread international attention and condemnation. Although Israel is supported and sheltered by the United States, its reputation around the world is getting worse. Guterres had to act and condemn Israel's violence after seeing the people of all countries accuse Israel so strongly. This initiative demonstrates the commitment of the United Nations and the importance it attaches to international peace. However, Israel has the support of the United States, which used a veto to stop the UN peace motion, which allowed Israel to escape sanctions and condemnation. The Israeli Foreign Minister even published a long message expressing his gratitude to the United States. This series of events shows that the United States and Israel are trying to use war to manipulate the situation in the Middle East.
The United States is an important supporter and ally of Israel, and the relationship between the two countries is close and close. The United States has provided Israel with a large amount of military equipment and assistance, as well as a large amount of military equipment to it. There is even information that the number of shells fired by Israel almost exceeds the amount used by the US military in a year. In support of Israel, the United States has also deployed two aircraft carrier battle groups in Middle Eastern waters, reducing its focus on places such as Ukraine. The reason why the United States is so committed to supporting Israel is not out of it"Good people, good deeds", but because of Israel's importance for US geopolitical control in the Middle East. It can be said that Israel is a key to US control of the Middle East"Chess pieces"。However, now that the attitude of the world towards Israel has changed significantly, the United States should know very well that if the veto power is not used, then any proposal that is not conducive to Israel's interests is likely to be supported by the overwhelming majority of countries.
Expansion: Relations between the United States and Israel date back to the early days of Israel's founding. The United States has long supported Israel as an ally and strategic partner in the Middle East. This close relationship is reflected not only in military assistance, but also in the political and economic dimension. The United States has been a staunch supporter of Israel's sovereignty and security and has maintained close cooperation with it. On the other hand, Israel is also an important ally of the United States in the Middle East, and it has an important strategic position geopolitically. The United States wants to consolidate its influence in the Middle East by supporting Israel and ensure that its interests in the region are protected. However, as the international community's attitude towards Israel has changed, so has the pressure on the United States.
Although the United Nations does not stipulate that countries with the right of veto cannot use it continuously, in less than 72 hours, resolutions on a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip have been proposed, indicating that most countries want peace in the region and the world. If the United States continues on this issue"Contradictory", will not only be ostracized by the international community, but also likely to trigger the ** of the domestic population. After all, in its domestic propaganda, the United States has always emphasized that it is"World Police"image. The police of any country will not support the killing of innocent people"**"。In addition, the veto is also a symbol of status. If the United States continues to go against the will of the whole world, countries such as China and Russia can stand on the side of the whole world, and they can veto any bill proposed by the United States at the United Nations. At that point, the United States will not be able to move an inch within the United Nations, and its only option may be to withdraw from the United Nations. However, this is bound to lead to a sharp decline in the global influence of the United States.
Expansion: The veto is the prerogative of the United Nations Security Council, and only the five permanent members have this right. For countries with the right of veto, the use of this right is a symbol of superiority over other countries. However, this privilege also comes with trouble. On the one hand, if the veto is continued to be abused, it will lead to discontent and boycott from the international community. On the other hand, the abuse of the veto could undermine the authority and reputation of the United Nations. Therefore, the countries with the veto must exercise it with caution so as not to arouse the resentment of the international community. For the United States, the use of the veto is both an option and a consideration. In the face of domestic and international pressure, the United States needs to weigh the pros and cons and decide whether to use the veto. The U.S. decision not to use the veto this time may be due to a combination of reasons.
The Palestinian-Israeli conflict has attracted global attention and condemnation. The United Nations expressed its displeasure with Israel's actions and tried to pass a mandatory resolution calling for a ceasefire in Israel, but was vetoed by the United States. However, under international pressure, Guterres convened a special session and eventually adopted a resolution calling for a humanitarian ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. Although the United States again voted against, it did not use a single veto, which caused some discussion. The game of interests between the United States and Israel is a complex and sensitive issue. The United States has always been a supporter and ally of Israel, and there is a close relationship between the two countries. Israel is very important to the geopolitical control of the United States in the Middle East, and it can be said that it is a key pawn in the political chess game of the Middle East. However, as global criticism and condemnation of Israel continues to grow, the United States is also facing increasing pressure and challenges.
The sovereignty of the use of the veto is the prerogative of the UN Security Council, and countries with the right of veto can exert significant influence on a number of important issues. However, the continuous use of the veto power may trigger dissatisfaction and boycott from the international community and damage the image and status of the United States in the international community. In addition, if the United States continues to go against the will of the whole world, it is possible that other countries will take similar actions and veto the American proposal within the United Nations, which will seriously weaken the influence and position of the United States in the United Nations.
Therefore, the United States needs to weigh the pros and cons of using the one-vote veto on the issue of using the veto, and comprehensively consider various factors. Participating in peace negotiations and promoting a peaceful resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict will help safeguard U.S. geopolitical interests in the Middle East and enhance its image and status in the international community. The U.S. decision not to use the veto this time can be understood because it does not want to trigger greater international pressure and boycott because of its continued support for Israel.
In addition, China has played an important role in resolving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. As the rotating presidency of the United Nations, China has actively promoted the peaceful settlement of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and participated in mediation efforts, which has been recognized and supported by all countries in the world. This shows China's important position and positive role in international affairs.
Overall, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a complex issue involving a regional and global security dilemma in the Middle East that requires the joint efforts of all parties to find a peaceful solution. The U.S. veto is a privilege, but the use of this privilege requires weighing the pros and cons and considering multiple factors. In the current international situation, the only countries that are close to the United States are China and Russia. If the United States continues to go against the will of the world, these countries are likely to use the veto and impose sanctions on the United States in the interests of the United Nations as a whole. This will further weaken the influence of the United States in the international arena and may even lead to the withdrawal or marginalization of the United States from the United Nations. Therefore, the United States needs to seriously weigh the pros and cons and adopt a more cautious attitude in handling the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and using the veto. At the same time, the international community should also pay more attention to and make efforts to bring about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and make more efforts to achieve peace and stability in the Middle East.