What to do?The United States has done another bad thing, how should we deal with it?Now we have to admit the fact that the Houthis have made the Red Sea a second battlefield in the Middle East in an extreme way. The Suez Canal and the Red Sea are the most important international shipping lanes, carrying 12% of the world's maritime cargo. In the face of a relentless Houthi attack, the world's five largest shipping companies, with the exception of China's ocean shipping companies, have recently suspended their voyages in the Red Sea.
Some shipping companies in China are also said to have taken circumvention measures to ensure safety. So what should we do?Israel has become uneasy, and the United States has a headache. Houthi, Housthis, do you remember that there was the United States and the way to and from?The United States immediately announced the formation of an international fleet called the Prosperity Guardian, which will cruise exclusively in the Red Sea. According to information published by the United States, ten countries have joined this international fleet: the United States, Great Britain, Paris, Canada, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Seychelles and Spain.
But the strength of these ten countries alone is not enough to deal with the situation, so at the press conference of China on December 21, there is such a Q&A, you can take a look at the content of this text version. Hello everyone!Recently, some remarks about US spokesman Robert Miller and China's security issues in the Red Sea region have attracted widespread attention. A reporter asked: Miller said earlier that the United States welcomes China's constructive role in deterring attacks launched in the Red Sea, and asked whether China is willing to play a more active role in maintaining security in the Red Sea region.
It's so much fun!The United States actually made a bad move and wanted to draw China into the Red Sea escort, so Miller openly threw out an olive branch and welcomed China to play a constructive role. Wang Wenbin responded solemnly: We oppose the act of attacking and harassing civilian vessels, and note that we have emphasized the "attack on civilian vessels", and we resolutely resist it. More importantly, Wang Wenbin also said that all parties, especially those influential powers, should be involved, not only by China, but also by playing a constructive and responsible role.
It is these words that give us a glimpse of the security situation in the Red Sea between China and the United States. It is self-evident that the United States wants to use China to contain the situation in the Red Sea. Their expectations of China are evident. On the Chinese side, Wang Wenbin once again made it clear that he resolutely opposes the act of damaging civilian ships in the Red Sea region. This statement fully illustrates China's firm position in maintaining security in the Red Sea.
At the same time, Wang Wenbin's other remarks are also very eye-catching. He stressed on more than one occasion that all parties should participate in the joint participation, especially those influential powers, and that they should play an active and responsible role. This is undoubtedly an invitation to other countries to join in maintaining security in the Red Sea.
Security in the Red Sea is a matter of interest and stability for many parties, not just China and the United States. All parties should strengthen cooperation and play a constructive role in jointly maintaining peace and tranquility in the Red Sea region. China will continue to fulfill its international responsibilities, actively participate in it, and contribute its wisdom and strength to the safety of shipping in the Red Sea region.
Let's wait and see what China and the United States do on the Red Sea security issue. It is believed that through the active cooperation of the two sides, peace and stability in the Red Sea will be effectively guaranteedHouthi revenge, you have to be careful!Look at those countries that watched the United States recruit troops and did not move, have you ever wondered why?Is it because he was warned by the Houthis?That's right, the reason why they refused to send troops was precisely so as not to provoke the Houthis.
What's going on?The Houthis made it clear that their actions are all about supporting the oppressed Palestinian people, so the ships they attack are all related to Israel, and as long as you don't go to Israeli ports, everything will be fine. More importantly, they warned that those who dared to attack them would be met with their reprisals!That's a pretty serious threat!That's why those countries will wait and see, and only want to save themselves. The international fleet that the United States has wooed this time, if you take a good look, it is really a mixture.
Although countries with great influence are involved, it must be said that Russia and NATO, among others, are absent. NATO has more than 30 countries, why are there so many missing?Even Australia has made it clear that it refused!What is even more surprising is that none of the navies of the 10 countries co-opted by the United States are a major Middle Eastern power, such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt and other countries bordering the Red Sea. Even Saudi Arabia, which is at odds with the Houthis, has refused, which shows how firm their refusal is.
It seems that these countries have all contributed to their own prudent but wise decision-making. After all, who wants to provoke such a formidable enemy?The problem that the United States is facing now is not an ordinary headache and foot pain, but a ring of troubles. They want to pull China together to join Xinli's Little Jiujiu, but we have long seen through their minds. Everyone is angry, who wants to stand with the United States?
After all, Gaza is bleeding, and the United States is Israel's backstage. Even if the Saudis and the Houthis have been fighting for so many years, their attitude is very clear that the international fleet of the United States will not participate. So we have to oppose attacks on civilian vessels, because it's not good for the whole world. But to solve the Red Sea problem, it is necessary to involve influential powers and to have a constructive and responsible attitude. What is constructive and responsible?That is, we must not only treat the symptoms, but solve the problem fundamentally.
To solve the Red Sea issue, the Houthi issue must be handled fairly, otherwise the dispute cannot be settled. And even against one Houthi, it cannot rule out the emergence of other problems. A barefoot person, even if he is not afraid of the person wearing the shoes to break it, will create a new mess. These issues are all interconnected, and no one is immune to them. Therefore, the United States needs to listen to the advice of the old Chinese medicine practitioners, and only by treating both the symptoms and the root causes can the world's diseases be cured.