Since the outbreak of the military conflict between Russia and Ukraine at the end of February last year, this complex and serious geopolitical dispute has lasted for more than 500 days, but the trend of the war has become more and more confusing, and there is no sign of stopping.
While Ukraine was mired in war, the United States led NATO to constantly challenge Russia's bottom line, which in turn led to the escalation of the war situation. In order to cope with the possibility of a nuclear war breaking out at any time, Russia is also increasing its military spending.
On the 26th of this month, RIA Novosti reported a speech by Medvedev, in which he believes that Russia is now left with fewer and fewer options, but is ready for it, even if the conflict will pay a greater price than in 1945.
As soon as these remarks came out, while causing heated discussions in the international community, they also cast a shadow on the Russian-Ukrainian war. After all, once this geopolitical war develops into a world war, it will inevitably lead the entire human race into the dark abyss of war.
At the same time, in the process of escalating the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, Western countries, which originally wanted to reap the benefits of the fisherman, have begun to realize that there seems to be something wrong with this matter from the direction of this war and their own interests.
According to the previous assumptions of Western countries, the Russian-Ukrainian war can, to a certain extent, play a role in containing and consuming Russia. However, as the course of the war continued to develop, European countries, which had been only the United States at the forefront, suddenly found that the wind was not in the right direction.
Because, in this "one-to-many" war, Russia has not only suffered a great deal of damage, but also seems to have a tendency to become more and more courageous the more it fights. On the other hand, some European countries that have provided military assistance to Ukraine have suffered unprecedented heavy losses.
Finland, located in Northern Europe, took the lead in toppling the first dominoes, citing the latest report in the New York Times, Sauli Niinistö believes that Europe and Russia must tolerate and understand each other today. Otherwise, it is highly likely that the Russian-Ukrainian war will develop to an unpredictable level, and there is also a risk of escalating into a nuclear war.
The reason why Sauli Niinistö is sober is that Finland is located in the northwest of Russia, and there is a border line of more than 1,300 kilometers between the two countries, and once the Russian-Ukrainian war escalates into a nuclear war, Finland is bound to be the first to suffer.
In addition, the old European country of the Netherlands is not far behind, and the country's admiral has also made relevant remarks a few days ago, Rob Bauer believes that NATO's military spending is increasing year after year, which is the source of insecurity.
According to the latest CCTV financial report, Morawiecki also said on the 20th local time that from the date of the statement, Poland will no longer provide ** to Ukraine, and whether it will be provided in the future depends on the specific situation.
The reason why Poland made this move is not just for Zelensky's relevant remarks. Because, from the perspective of its own strength and development, the country seems to be in a hurry to get rid of this hot potato, after all, continuing to aid Ukraine is a bottomless pit.
The successive reversals in attitude of European countries make people think that a year ago, China's choice was too wise. In the early days of the Russian-Ukrainian war, the United States dragged NATO countries into small groups, and then continued to attack Russia.
The purpose of the United States is very clear, that is, to nail Russia to the invader's pillar of shame, and then to achieve the goal of providing military assistance to Ukraine by constantly stirring up the situation, while making a lot of money in silence.
China, on the other hand, has always looked at the Russian-Ukrainian war very calmly, and withstood the pressure from Western countries, always choosing to remain neutral, facing Russia and Ukraine from a rational perspective, hoping that the two sides can resolve the conflict through negotiations.
At the beginning, Western countries led by the United States were very dissatisfied with China's approach, and even did not hesitate to distort the facts, believing that China's so-called neutrality was actually a platform for Russia.
But the truth is always in the hands of a few, and it is not until more than 500 days after the Russian-Ukrainian conflict that European countries seem to wake up that Russia is only fighting for its own national interests.
If NATO countries had had this foresight, they would not have gotten to the point where they are today. At this time, European countries realized that China's choice was the wisest and most correct choice.
[References].
The ** war in the Russian-Ukrainian war and its enlightenment" Wang Lin.
The U.S. Intervention in the Russia-Ukraine War and Its Impact on U.S. Policy in the Taiwan Strait" He Liu Wang Weinan.