Recently, the conflict between Israel and Hamas has escalated againU.S. Secretary of StateBlinken made a very different statement in the process, which attracted a lot of attention. Blinken not only stressed the need for Israel to complete its campaign against Hamas in a matter of weeks, but also to use IsraelInternationalPressure on Israel on the grounds of social pressure. However, this 180-degree change of attitude is not intended to distancing relations with Israel, but rather to help Israel achieve its desired goals in the conflict. This article will focus on the reasons for the shift in attitudes in the United States and its possible implications.
The report from Israel** statesU.S. Secretary of StateDuring his most recent visit to Israel, Blinken issued a warning that Israel should complete its plan to destroy Hamas in weeks, not months. This statement is different from the past, emphasizing not only the time constraints for action, but also the coming fromInternationalSocietal pressures. Indeed, the United States has been a staunch supporter of Israel since the outbreak of the conflict and continues to support Israel in the General Assembly and in the Security Council. This 180-degree change in attitude has raised questions about what is the reason behind it
According to the analysis, this change of attitude may be in order for Israel to achieve the desired goals as soon as possible and to avoid dealing withInternationalThere are too many contradictions in society. After all, the conflict has led to a large number of Palestinian civilians** and a humanitarian crisis, which has triggeredInternationalThere is a strong social dissatisfaction with Israel. If the United States continues to fully support Israel, it will face a ** andInternationalThe double distress of stress. Therefore, by expressing its stance and asking Israel to shorten the duration of its operation, this pressure can be alleviated to a certain extent and the interests of the United States itself can be safeguarded. In addition, the United States may also take into accountMiddle EastThe complexity of the situation, hopefully avoidedMiddle EastPlunged into a war on a larger scale.
Although the U.S. rhetoric toward Israel has changed, it does not mean that its relations with Israel have been significantly shaken. In fact, the United States has always been a staunch supporter of Israel, both in public and in publicMilitaryaction. This shift can be seen as a blow to the side and a warning to Israel, which is intended to remind Israel not to rely too much on the support of the United States and to work harder to achieve the desired goals. This shift can also be interpreted as a potential support for Israel's actions, and although the public statements are different, the United States may still be behind the scenes to provide support and assistance to help Israel achieve its war goals.
On the one hand, the statements of the United States may help Israel inInternational** on the legitimacy. Over the past few weeks, the conflict has led to a large number of Palestinian civilians**, triggeredInternationalA strong condemnation from society. This could be mitigated by imposing limits on Israel and shortening the duration of operationsInternationalSociety's condemnation of Israel has given Israel more space. On the other hand, by withInternationalPutting pressure on Israel on the grounds of social pressure can force Israel to work harder to achieve the desired goals and ensure victory in the war. From this point of view, the U.S. statement is actually aimed at helping Israel achieve its war goals, rather than drawing a line with Israel.
The change in U.S. attitude has to do not only with Israel's war goals, but also with America's own interests and risk considerations. InMiddle Eastregion, the United States is an important global strategic concern, which concerns the United StatesEnergy security, geopolitical interests and regional stability. Therefore, the United States always wants to keepMiddle Eastof relative stability to avoid the outbreak of large-scale wars. in the current oneIsraeli-Palestinian conflictMedium,Middle EastSome countries may intervene by force, especially in IsraelMilitaryThe longer the action, the higher the risk. In order to avoidMiddle EastPlunged into chaos and large-scale war, the United States may put pressure on Israel to end its operations as soon as possible.
In addition, the United States is rightMiddle EastThe fourth of the region's four key objectives also provides some clues. The US Department of Defense has noted that one of its goals is to prevent other countries from interveningIsraeli-Palestinian conflictto extend the crisis beyond Gaza. The implication is that the United States does not want toMiddle EastOther countries intervened in the conflict and, to a certain extent, reminded them not to act lightly. Therefore, against this background, the United States asks Israel to shorten itMilitaryThe time to act is not only to protect one's own interests, but also to maintainMiddle Eastof the relative stability.
The 180-degree shift in the attitude of the United States has raised eyebrows, however, this change is not to draw a line with Israel, but to help Israel achieve its desired goals as soon as possible and avoid itInternationalThere are too many contradictions in society. By asking Israel to shortenMilitaryaction time, and to:InternationalPressure on the grounds of social pressure can be alleviated to a certain extentInternational** Condemnation. In addition, the United States takes into accountMiddle EastThe complexity of the situation, hopefully avoidedMiddle EastPlunged into a large-scale war. However, despite the different statements, the United States remains a staunch supporter of Israel and is likely to provide support and assistance behind the scenes to help Israel achieve its war goals. This shift in rhetoric is intended to help Israel achieve its goals, not to draw a line with Israel. U.S. interests and risk considerations are also important factors influencing the change in its attitude, and the U.S. wants to maintain themMiddle EastThe relative stability of avoidedMiddle Eastplunge into chaos and large-scale wars and prevent other countries from interveningIsraeli-Palestinian conflict。Overall, the U.S. shift is aimed at helping Israel achieve its desired goals and safeguard its own interests and regional stability.