Vanke and Evergrande are both leaders in China's real estate market, but their business strategies and corporate cultures are very different. Recently, the relationship between Vanke and Evergrande has become the focus of everyone's attention, as whether Vanke should help Evergrande has become a hot topic.
First, let's review the history of Vanke and Evergrande. Vanke is an enterprise that pays attention to standardized management, and its corporate culture is known for its stability and standardization. Evergrande, on the other hand, is known for its high-debt, high-leverage, and high-turnover business model, which has developed rapidly, but also has relatively high risks. In the past few years, Evergrande has encountered difficulties due to problems such as the rupture of the capital chain, while Vanke has been able to develop steadily because of its sound management and standardized operation.
However, in 2016, Evergrande became Vanke's largest shareholder through the acquisition of Vanke's shares. This complicates the relationship between Vanke and Evergrande. On the one hand, Vanke needs to protect its own interests and prevent Evergrande from interfering in Vanke's management by controlling its equityOn the other hand, Evergrande, as the largest shareholder of Vanke, also needs to protect its interests.
In this battle for control, Vanke finally successfully resisted Evergrande's attack through a variety of means. The war has strained the relationship between Vanke and Evergrande. However, from another perspective, Vanke and Evergrande are both important players in China's real estate market, and cooperation between them is also possible.
Recently, there was news that Vanke may help Evergrande solve the problem of capital chain. In this regard, some people support and some people oppose it. Proponents argue that both Vanke and Evergrande are important players in China's real estate market, and their cooperation will help boost China's real estate market. Moreover, Vanke has a very high level of management and technology, and if it can help Evergrande improve its management level and business model, then Evergrande's development will be more stable and sustainable.
Opponents, however, argue that Vanke should not help Evergrande. Because there are great risks in Evergrande's business model, if Vanke helps Evergrande solve the problem of capital chain, then it may further increase the risk of Evergrande. Moreover, Vanke and Evergrande have completely different corporate cultures and management styles, and if Vanke intervenes in Evergrande's management, it may lead to incompatibility and contradictions between the two parties.
Overall, the question of whether Vanke should help Evergrande is a complex one. While there may be some benefits to a partnership between the two parties, there are also a lot of risks and challenges. Therefore, before making a decision, Vanke needs to fully consider various factors, including its own interests, Evergrande's operating conditions, and the market environment. At the same time, the two sides should also strengthen communication and consultation to seek a better solution.