In order to stop China at the tipSemiconductorsBeyond the field,United States**took the approach of a technological blockade to ChinaChipsThe industry is suppressed. However, this approach is not only detrimental to the long-term interests of the United States itself, but also creates opportunities for other countries. Why is Biden so persistent?Recently, U.S. Commerce Secretary Raimondo said that more money is needed to stop China at the cutting edgeSemiconductorsCatch-up in the field. However, this practice is not only for the American mainlandChipsCompanies have caused losses and have sparked dissatisfaction among these companies.
In response to American companies, Raimondo threatened Nvidia by name, saying that if they redesigned a model for use by Chinese companiesChipsAt the same time, if it does not touch the U.S. technology control policy, then the U.S. Department of Commerce will immediately take control measures against it. United States**Asking domestic companies to sacrifice their own interests for the sake of the so-called "**." However, this kind of suppression does not bring a real threat to the United States, but only to "put on a mask" for American companies.
Despite the fact that China and the United States are inChipsThere is a certain gap in high-tech industries, but with the passage of time, this gap will gradually narrow. Especially after the U.S. technology blockade and export controls on China, China will invest more money and energy in research and development of its ownChipstechnology to cater to domestic businesses andInternationalThe demand of the market. At present, China and the United States are inChipsThe gap in the field of technology is also only five to ten years. HuaweiThe company is a clear example when the United States is rightHuaweiConductedChipsWhen there was a supply outage and a technological blockade, it was originally thought that it would take 10 years to achieve independent productionChipsofHuawei, returning to the high-end in just three yearsMobile phonesMarket.
SuppressionChinese chipsThe action will not slow down the development of China's related technology fields, but will make the United States lose its competitive and monopoly advantage. United States**Qualcomm, Nvidia, etcChipsExecutives at technology companies, as well as some academics familiar with technological developments, say that strictChipsA technological blockade will only lose the interests of the United States itself. However, Biden seems to have fallen on deaf ears and demanded that businesses sacrifice their own interests for the sake of the so-called "**." This divergence of positions fully reflects the shortcomings of the American political system.
Artificially create technological barriers, and want to completely stop China through technological blockade and export controlSemiconductorsChipsThe development of the industry is not feasible. This point from South Korea to ChinaIndustrial chainClues can also be seen in the change of cooperation. According to reports, South Korea's exports to China have recently surged, which has solved the downward pressure on South Korea's economy, thanks in large part to South KoreaChipsEnterprises resumed exports to the Chinese market. South Korea has made it clear that continued cooperation with China is necessary and that it will adopt a pragmatic policy when it comes to chain cooperation. This shows that South Korea has realized the importance of cooperation with China for its own economic interests, and no longer blindly follows the US policy toward China. Today's South Korea is the United States of the future.
While the United States is still more powerful than South Korea in terms of technology and capital, with the presence of ChinaSemiconductorsChipsIndustrial chainThe technological gap between China and the United States will gradually narrow. For the foreseeable future, the United States will have to actively seek cooperation with China. However, due to the special nature of the American electoral system, successive editionsUnited States**They all pursue short-term political achievements, focusing only on their own policies during their own administration, and do not consider long-term interests. Therefore, Biden** is persistent in suppressing China, even knowing that a technological blockade will not solve the problem of declining competitiveness in the United States.
All in all, by suppressing China'sChipsindustry to stop its development isUnited States**Fallen into the misunderstanding. Moreover, this approach is not conducive to the long-term interests of the United States itself. Over time,Chinese chipsThe industry will rise rapidly, and the United States will have to seek cooperation with China. South Korea's attitude toward China has shifted, suggesting that U.S. policy is doomed.