The online rhetoric that caused an uproar: Is the death penalty imposed on traffickers too hasty?
There has been a heated debate online about whether the legal penalties for traffickers are too lenient. Many netizens have called for the death penalty because of their deep hatred of human traffickers. However, some believe that it was too intense"Cyber Trials", which is debated.
A deep hatred of human traffickers is the real reason for the call for the death penalty.
Netizens do not seem to have thought it through, but because their disgust with human traffickers has reached a certain depth. They see traffickers as more abominable than murderers, because they don't kill them directly, but they separate families and can't be reunited for years, decades, or even lifetimes.
Just imagine if your child was abducted at the age of one or two, and you couldn't be sure if he was still alive or even when he would be able to see each other again. This kind of pain is unforgettable, and it may even be that the child is still somewhere in the world, but has forgotten himself.
A touching story of forty years of separation.
A recent news story in the Northeast is thought-provoking. A 1-year-old boy was found by his mother after 41 years, and the mother and son met with tears pouring down their eyes. In the seventies and eighties of the last century, Feng Yongying, a rural woman, came to the city with her one-year-old son to look for work. At the train station, she had to go to the toilet and asked a kind-looking middle-aged woman to take care of the child. However, when she came out, she found that the child was gone.
Although Feng Yongying called the police and launched a large-scale search at that time, due to technical constraints, the child could not be found in the end. Feng Yongying also failed to find her son after her husband and mother-in-law died one after another. Forty years have passed, and Feng Yongying's hopes for her children have gradually waned.
* Strive to find the long road.
On the other hand, forty-year-old Gao Zhao had questions about his life experience after bidding farewell to his adoptive mother. He has tried several times to find his biological parents, but to no avail. In January last year, the Ministry of Public Security deployed a nationwide operation, and Feng Yongying was able to find her son.
Through the collection of blood samples from the Y bank, ** found that a man named Gao Zhao in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region matched Li Guofu's brother Li Guoqing, who had been missing for many years. This means that Li Guofu, who has been missing for 40 years, may be found.
Mother and son are happy to see each other again.
After careful investigation and action, ** finally found Gao Zhao, and confirmed that he was Feng Yongying's biological son Li Guofu through genetic comparison. The mother and son were reunited at the gate of a small village in the northeast, and 72-year-old Feng Yongying and his son Li Guofu, who is in his 40s, burst into tears. This embrace, forty years late.
The story of a mother and son who have been separated for forty years.
After the mother and son recognized each other, Li Guofu stayed in his hometown for many days. He decided to honor his mother for the rest of the time. Li Guofu also has his own family and has found a grandmother for his children.
Epilogue. 
Children seem to be just a commodity to traffickers, and this crime of depriving families of warmth is outrageous. When it comes to debating whether traffickers should be sentenced to death, people tend to argue from a legal perspective. However, there are some things, feelings, and watches that cannot be described in the letter of the law.
That's why people are so divided on this issue. If it were you, what would you choose?
Commentary: Law, humanity and the reunion of mother and child after forty years of separation.
This article deeply touches on the multi-layered thinking of people's laws, humanity and family. In the online debate about the death penalty for human traffickers, we see the complex interweaving of society's feelings about legal justice and individual feelings. Through the true story of the reunion of mother and son after 40 years of separation, the article provides a more profound perspective for this debate.
First of all, the call for the death penalty for traffickers can be understood as an extreme anger at the crime. The desire for family and the pain of loss make them expect the law to treat criminals who destroy families and rob children of their happiness with the same harshness. This emotional outburst is often due to deep longing for family affection and dissatisfaction with crimes. However, we must also think rationally about whether the death penalty really solves the problem, and whether the law should impose such harsh sentences on the basis of emotion.
Second, the issue of online adjudication mentioned in the article is also quite thought-provoking. In the age of the Internet, the rapid dissemination and wide circulation of information have enabled the public to understand various events more intuitively. However, overly heated rhetoric and excessive online trials can also trigger social instability and lead to the destruction of the rule of law. Therefore, we need to be more rational and objective about online speech, and ensure that emotions are not allowed to dominate the public**.
The story of the reunion of mother and son, who have been separated for 40 years, is even more touching and provokes deep thinking. In the age of underdeveloped technology, the search for missing children is almost a hopeless journey. However, through the efforts of the national public security organs, the mother and son, who had been separated for 40 years, were finally found. This story teaches us that no matter how much time passes, family ties are always the strongest bonds. Feng Yongying persisted in searching for her son for 40 years, and finally got her wish, and this kind of mother's persistence and tenacity are admirable.
Finally, the life after the reunion of mother and child also leaves us with food for thought. After Li Guofu returned to his mother, he decided to honor his mother, showing the value of family harmony and affection. It also reminds us that no matter what happens, family is always the warmest harbor, and family affection is the red thread that runs through life.
Overall, the essay succeeds in provoking reflections on the law, humanity, and family through deep stories, vivid details, and powerful discourse. In this complex society, we need to be more rational and tolerant of legal issues, and at the same time, we must cherish and promote the warmth of family and the sincerity of family affection.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!