From the perspective of farmers, pay attention to the three rural areas!Hello farmers, I am a farmer!Every time I talk about the topic of one household and one house, Lao Dao really has mixed feelings in his heart!The situation in the rural areas is very complicated, and the situation of peasant families is also different, and if we disregard the actual situation and promote one house per household in a one-size-fits-all manner, the interests of some peasants will be harmed!There has been a heated discussion among experts about one house per house, and some experts have expressed their views on one house per house!At least in the matter of one house per household, some experts have finally spoken out to the hearts of farmers!Why do some experts think that one house is unreasonable?What are the views of the experts on the issue of one household and one house?For us farmers, we must be aware of the specific standards for each household and one houseIf it exceeds the standard of one house per household, will the extra homestead be repossessed?In response to these problems, Lao Dao will make a simple report to everyone!Let's talk about the specific situation!
Is "one household, one house" in rural areas unreasonable?The expert's point of view is eye-catching!】
The old Tao said:The policy of one household and one house has always attracted wide attention, especially in the context of the continuous appreciation of rural land and farmhouses, and the promotion of the policy of one household and one house is related to the vital interests of every farmerMany experts have expressed their opinions on one house and one house!After many experts released their views, Cai Jiming, director of the Political Economy Research Center of Tsinghua University, resonated with many farmersHe spoke the words of the peasant's heart!
Cai Jiming's point of view 1: Urban residents can have more houses per family, why can't farmers?
The old Tao said:It's the same house, why do urban residents have many houses for a family, but farmers can't?It is unfair for a farmer to build a house on the inherited homestead and only one house per household!Cai Jiming believes that both urban and rural residents have the freedom to pursue a better life, so why can't farmers be allowed to own a second set of homesteads?As for the acquisition of two sets of homestead land, Cai Jiming believes that the villagers' committee should set the price according to the actual needs of each locality. Do you agree with and support Cai Jiming's views?Let me know in the comments section!
Cai Jiming's point of view 2: Urban residents have the right to dispose of their housing and benefit from it, why don't farmers?
The old Tao said:Cai Jiming thinks"Property Law"It stipulates that urban residents have the right to use, lease, transfer, dispose of and benefit, and the law gives urban residents the right to use residential land. However, rural residents only have the right to use the homestead land, and do not have the right to dispose of it and the right to benefit, which is incomplete. Now, according to the "No. 1 Document" that has been issued, the state has pointed out that farmers can explore intermediary services and obtain all kinds of income from homesteads and farmhousesSome of the experts' views also have an impact and touch on the policy level!
Cai Jiming's point of view 3: Only by allowing the internal circulation of homesteads is in line with the trend of land reform!
The old Tao said:Cai Jiming believes that this problem can only be solved by liberalizing the circulation of homestead land and allowing homestead land to enter the market, and invigorating land resources is also in line with the goal of land reform; otherwise, idle farmhouses will be worthless, and the wealth of the cities will not be able to feed the rural areas. In this year, the state has made it clear that it will vigorously carry out the registration of the ownership of the integrated homestead of rural real estate and land, and the farmhouse and homestead will officially enter the era of warrantsFarmers with warrants will get more benefits and their rights and interests will be fully protected!
Cai Jiming's views have resonated with many farmers!Under the vigorous promotion of various national policies to benefit farmers, the relationship between rural homesteads, farmhouses and farmers will be closer!In terms of the specific homestead area identification, the household in one house is mainly aimed at the household registration book, one person can be one household, and ten people can also be one household!The house in one household and one house mainly refers to the sum of the residential homestead area of the family members in the household registration book, as long as the actual use of the homestead area book does not exceed the total number, the rescue belongs to one house!It doesn't matter how many homesteads there are!For homesteads that exceed the area, some areas will carry out pilot projects related to paid use!The above is the general situation in terms of the criteria for the identification of one household and one house!
2023 is a key year for comprehensively promoting rural revitalization, with various national reform policies implemented in rural areas, Lao Dao believes that agriculture and rural areas will have better development in the future!The vitality of rural land and homesteads will be activated and released, and the lives of farmers will be better!Here, Lao Dao implores everyone to take action, click on the lower right corner of the article [Looking], let us work together for the country's rural revitalization strategy, three rural support policies to like!
Three rural