With the defeat of Ukraine, the Russian-Ukrainian peace talks have become the focus of more and more people's discussions. However, the attitude of the parties towards the peace talks is not consistent. Russia has been open-minded, while Ukraine has passed a bill declaring that it will not enter into peace talks with Putin-led Russia. The United States and its Western allies, on the other hand, have shown hesitation to stop providing large-scale aid to Ukraine, or even to provide offensive assistance**, although they believe that Ukraine is no longer capable of continuing the offensive, but they are not willing to lose the war. As a result, the current situation has reached a stalemate, the situation on the battlefield has hardly changed, and no substantive progress has been made in the peace talks. Breaking this impasse requires an opportunity, both on the battlefield and at the diplomatic level. On the whole, Russia currently holds the initiative.
After the defeat in Ukraine, peace talks became the focus of discussion. Unlike Ukraine, which insists on refusing to engage in peace talks with Russia, Russia has always been open-minded. For Russia, peace talks help reduce losses from the conflict, reduce international pressure, and may open a new path to resolving the Ukrainian issue. The Ukrainian side announced through a bill that it would not hold peace talks with Russia led by Putin, showing its distrust of Russia and its resolute position. In addition, the United States and its Western allies are also hesitant to provide large-scale assistance to Ukraine, and are even unwilling to provide offensive**, a statement that shows that they believe that Ukraine is no longer capable of continuing the offensive, but is not willing to completely lose the war. As a result, the current situation has reached a stalemate, the situation on the battlefield has hardly changed, and no substantial progress has been made in the peace talks. In order to break this impasse, an opportunity is needed, either on the battlefield or at the diplomatic level. On the whole, Russia currently holds the initiative and can decide its course according to its own strategic needs and diplomatic tactics.
Recently, it has been revealed that Russia has expressed its willingness to reach an agreement in a secret diplomatic effort with the intention of holding peace talks. According to ***, since September last year, Putin has expressed through an intermediary that he is open to a ceasefire on the current front. This position is a far cry from Putin's claim that he wants to dominate Ukraine. Even back in the fall of 2022, Putin had tentatively offered a ceasefire, a secret offer that implied that Russia was satisfied with the territories it occupied and was ready for a truce. According to a foreign country that met with Russia, the Russian side said that they are ready to negotiate a ceasefire, but on the condition that it is in accordance with the current situation on the battlefield. In other words, Russia is willing to cease the war, but not to back down an inch. This series of signals shows that Russia has been seeking opportunities for peace talks and has put forward conditions for accepting the reality of the situation.
Recently, it has been revealed that Russia has expressed its willingness to reach an agreement in secret diplomatic efforts with the intention of holding peace talks. This news has attracted the attention of all parties. According to some *** claims, Putin has expressed through intermediaries last September that he is open to a ceasefire along the front lines of the current conflict. This position is a far cry from Putin's alleged desire to dominate Ukraine. Even in the autumn of 2022, Putin had made a tentative offer for a ceasefire, a secret offer that implied that Russia was satisfied with the territories it occupied and was ready for a truce. These signals reveal Russia's intention to seek peace talks and put forward a series of conditions to accept the reality of the situation.
According to foreign sources, they learned during their meeting with Russia that the Russian side said that they were ready to negotiate a ceasefire, but on the condition that it was in accordance with the current situation on the battlefield. This means that Russia is willing to cease the war, but will not concede an inch of land. This series of actions shows that Russia has been seeking opportunities for peace talks and has put forward conditions for accepting the reality of the situation.
Judging by these messages, Russia has been looking for opportunities for peace talks, but they have one of the most basic conditions, and that is to accept "territorial realities". The proposition of this condition shows that Russia is not unable to bear it. If Russia really can't bear it, it won't insist on this condition. In fact, these situations mentioned by the US media have long been publicly mentioned by the Russian side. They have never opposed peace talks, and the demand for acceptance of "territorial realities" has always been a condition put forward by Russia. These are not secrets, as long as anyone who cares about the news can know about them. As for the so-called "Putin's ambition to dominate Ukraine", this in itself is unfounded. Putin has never wanted to erase Ukraine or dominate it. It is untenable for the US media to forcibly create the bias that Russia is secretly prescribing conditions for peace talks, in an attempt to prove that Russia does not want to fight. Although Russia may be making some concessions in private, their position has not changed, and merely expressing a willingness to engage in peace talks does not prove anything wrong.
From these messages, it can be seen that Russia has been seeking opportunities for peace talks, but they are demanding recognition of "territorial realities". This shows that Russia is not unable to bear it. Otherwise, they wouldn't have insisted on this condition. Actually, these circumstances are not secrets, and the Russian side has already mentioned them in public. Russia has always been open-minded, has never opposed peace talks, and has always demanded acceptance of the reality of the situation. This is an unfounded accusation of the so-called "Putin's ambition to dominate Ukraine". Putin has never intended to erase Ukraine or dominate it. The US media tried to prove that Russia does not want to fight by portraying Russia secretly offering conditions for peace talks, but this is untenable. Although Russia may be making some concessions in private, their position has not changed, and merely expressing a willingness to engage in peace talks does not prove anything wrong.
At the moment, Russia is completely in the hands of the initiative, both on the battlefield and at the diplomatic level. Russia can choose to continue fighting, or it can choose to maintain the status quo. At the diplomatic level, Russia is in a position to prescribe conditions. If the West and Ukraine do not accept it, Russia can continue to fight until the other side accepts it. Of course, war is not child's play, and the situation can change over time, and some unexpected situations may arise. Russia may have sought an opportunity for peace talks earlier in order to avoid a prolonged war or to reduce its losses. But it is definitely not the feeling that Russia can't bear as created by the American media. In the current situation, Russia is in the position of the initiative and can decide on its next steps according to its strategic and diplomatic needs.
At the moment, Russia is completely in the hands of the initiative, both on the battlefield and at the diplomatic level. On the battlefield, Russia can choose to continue fighting, or it can choose to maintain the status quo and not attack. At the diplomatic level, Russia can prescribe some conditions, and if the West and Ukraine do not accept it, Russia can continue to fight until the other side accepts it. Of course, war is not child's play, and the situation can change over time, and some unexpected situations may arise. Russia may have sought an opportunity for peace talks earlier in order to avoid the continuation of the war or to reduce its losses. But it is definitely not the feeling that Russia can't bear as created by the American media. In the current situation, Russia is in the position of the initiative and can decide on its next steps according to its strategic and diplomatic needs.
The only way to solve the Ukrainian problem is to conduct peace talks. The devastation and losses caused by the war have already taken a heavy toll on the Ukrainian people. In addition, the war has also led to tensions between Ukraine and Russia, making economic and political cooperation between the two countries difficult. The goal of the peace talks should be to achieve the territorial integrity and stability of Ukraine, as well as peaceful coexistence between Russia and Ukraine. In order to achieve peace talks, all parties should negotiate on the basis of equality and reciprocity, and respect each other's rights and interests. All parties should make compromises for peace talks in order to achieve the core demands of both sides. Despite the difficulties on the road to peace talks, it is only through peace talks that lasting peace and stability can be achieved.
The only way to solve the Ukrainian problem is to conduct peace talks. The war has brought enormous destruction and losses to the Ukrainian people, and Ukraine can no longer afford it. In addition, the war has led to tensions between Ukraine and Russia, making economic and political cooperation between the two countries difficult. The goal of the peace talks should be to achieve the territorial integrity and stability of Ukraine, as well as peaceful coexistence between Russia and Ukraine. In order to achieve peace talks, all parties should negotiate on the basis of equality and reciprocity, and respect each other's rights and interests. The parties should also make compromises for peace talks in order to achieve the core demands of both sides. Despite the difficulties on the road to peace talks, it is only through peace talks that lasting peace and stability can be achieved.
The solution to the Ukrainian problem requires drawing on the experience of the peaceful settlement of the conflict in the past. For example, it is possible to learn from the experience of conflict resolution in the eastern regions of Ukraine. In this region, Ukraine** and Russian-backed separatist forces have defused the conflict through joint ceasefires and prisoner exchanges. In addition, the experience of negotiations between Ukraine and Russia during the Crimean crisis in Ukraine can be learned. Although ultimately unsuccessful, these negotiations provided valuable lessons for resolving the Ukrainian issue. In addition, reference can be made to the success stories of other countries in conflict resolution, such as the peace processes in Yugoslavia, Colombia and other regions. In short, resolving the Ukraine issue requires the joint efforts of all parties to actively explore solutions that are in line with the actual situation and learn from past experiences and lessons.
The solution to the Ukrainian problem requires drawing on the experience of the peaceful settlement of the conflict in the past. We can learn from the experience of conflict resolution in eastern Ukraine, such as de-escalating the conflict through joint ceasefires, prisoner exchanges, etc. In addition, the experience of negotiations between Ukraine and Russia during the Crimean crisis in Ukraine can be learned. Although ultimately unsuccessful, these negotiations provided valuable experience for resolving the Ukrainian issue. In addition, reference can be made to the success stories of other countries in resolving conflicts, such as peace processes in Yugoslavia and Colombia. In the process of resolving the Ukraine issue, all parties should work together to actively explore solutions that suit the actual situation and learn from past experiences and lessons. Peace and stability in Ukraine can be achieved only through dialogue and compromise.