Since the outbreak of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, it has been the focus of attention of the international community. With the constant war and peace far away, people can't help but wonder if there is really no solution to this problemIn fact, it is not. However, Israel has always had the support of Western countries, which has made it difficult to solve the problem.
In the most recent vote in the UN Security Council, the United States again used its veto power for absurd reasons. They say the deal will not bring about peace in the Middle East and may even set the stage for the next war. It is clear that the United States is only here to support Israel, and according to their logic, the fastest peace in the Middle East can only be achieved by transferring all the forces in the Middle East. However, this is not likely to happen. The United States has taken the opposite side of humanitarianism and has aroused dissatisfaction in many countries.
Middle Eastern countries have denounced the partiality of the United States. Turkey's Erdogan said the United States manipulated the UN Security Council to make it Israel's protection committee. The ministerial committee of the Arab-Israeli summit also expressed its displeasure to the United States. These reactions show that the partiality of the United States in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict has caused collective anger in the countries of the Middle East. If the United States sticks to the wrong path, then its layout in the Middle East will face collapse.
The UN Secretary-General also expressed displeasure, saying that the failure of the humanitarian ceasefire had dealt a blow to the prestige of the UN. However, he still stressed the need to call for a ceasefire and said that efforts would continue. For many years, the United Nations was seen as an affiliate of the United States, and it now seems that it is no longer willing to play the role of a pawn. In the face of US favoritism, the UN and other countries can do more than condemn.
In the context of an increasingly diverse world, the application of multilateralism has become a good solution to international problems. At the 7th Imperial Springs International Forum in China, the President of the United Nations General Assembly put forward ideas for improving the United Nations. She believes that if the forces of multilateralist organizations such as the G20 and BRICS can be pooled, and the United Nations plays a central role, many problems will be solved. This new approach requires multilateral cooperation, attacks hegemony, allows countries to make decisions together, and avoids a situation in which one player dominates. If this approach is implemented, the Imperial Springs International Forum hosted by China will serve as an important platform. More than 40 countries participating in the forum are also looking for new ways out. However, it will take time to verify whether this scheme is successfully implemented and whether it can achieve the expected goals.
The resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict has always been the focus of global attention. The US veto has once again sparked controversy in the international community and made Middle Eastern countries deeply dissatisfied with the United States' partiality. The United Nations is no longer willing to act as a pawn of the United States, inspiring countries to find new solutions. The application of multilateralism was proposed, implying that consultation and cooperation would be an important way to resolve conflicts. As an independent-minded editor, I believe it is very important to resolve wars and conflicts through international cooperation and dialogue on an equal footing. Peace and stability can be truly achieved only on the basis of equality and justice. It is hoped that in the future, all countries will work together to find a feasible way to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and achieve lasting peace.