In recent years,varThe use of has becomeFootball matchesAn important technical means in . However, withvarThe popularity and gradual expansion of the scope of application, the referee is rightvaris also gradually increasing. This phenomenon caused quite a bit of controversy, and people began to thinkvarWhether the mandate should be further expanded. According to reportsInternational footballThe Council of Directors of the Association will meet to discuss whether to expandvarCompetence and use in competitions. At the same time, there is also informationvarwill be directly involvedFree kick, corners and a second yellow card. This news has aroused widespread attention and heated discussions.
ForvarOn the one hand, some people believe that this will help ensure a fair and just result of the game, and can avoid the referee's wrong decision at a critical moment. Especially cornersFree kickand other scenarios, which are often directly related to whether the team can score goals. IfvarIntervening in these scenarios will help prevent the wrong goal reward or goal being cancelled. On the other hand, there are also concernsvarFrequent intervention will lead to a decrease in the flow of the game, a longer period of play, and an increased reliance on referees in decision-making.
varThe role is to correct the referee's possible mistakes in the decision and ensure the fairness and impartiality of the game. IfvarAble to interveneFree kick, corners and a second yellow card will greatly improve the fairness of the game. Either wayFree kick, a goal from a corner, or a red card from a second yellow card can have a significant impact on the outcome of the game. Therefore, it is very important to ensure that the penalty is accurately judged in these scenarios.
However, ifvarAs the scope of intervention increases, so does the number of interruptions. varYou need to communicate with the referee, who needs to stop the game and wait for the result, which will lead to poor consistency in the game. It's also a lot of people's interestvarOne of the reasons for the negative attitude. The coherence of the game is critical to the spectatorship and spectator experience, so there are trade-offsvarThe balance between intervention and game coherence.
Another problem is that the referee's responsibilities will be reduced, rightvardependency will increase. The referee no longer needs to award some less important fouls, but only needs to focus on important decision decisions. This will greatly reduce the workload of the referee, but it may also deepen the referee's reliance on technology. This has weakened the professional level of referees to a certain extent, and has also raised concerns about the prospects and career development of the referee industry.
ForvarWhether the expansion of the mandate is realized still needs to be determined by voting. International footballThe Council of the Association has 4 votes and 4 in the UKFootballThe associations each have 1 vote and thus decide togethervarfuture directions. If the number of votes in favor of a rule change reaches 6, the change will take effect.
ForvarThere are both advantages and disadvantages in further expanding the scope of authority. On the one hand,varcan improve the fairness and impartiality of the game, ensure the accuracy of key decisions, and avoid the unfair impact on the outcome of the game due to wrong decisions. On the other hand,varFrequent intervention may lead to an increase in the number of interruptions in the game, reduce the consistency of the game, and also increase the referee's dependence on technology, making the responsibilities and limitations of the referee highlighted. Anyway,varThe future development will be made up of:FIFAand relevant associations to make decisions together to ensure:Football matchesFairness, impartiality and ornamentation will be their common goal. Find the trade-offs by considering the interests of all partiesvarand the consistency of the game, will bevarInFootball matchesThe key to sustainable development.