Modi boasted that India soared, throwing out big words The West relocates the industrial chain, and India surpasses China?”
Just now, Modi was ashamed to say in an interview that India is soaring, overtaking China. I can't help but feel a wave of indignation, what's going on?Is it really as he said, if the West relocates the industrial chain, India will be able to surpass China in one fell swoop?
It all started with Modi's emphasis on comparison with Western countries, not China. He went so far as to say that there are thousands of successful paths in the world, and the most superior one is actually the Western model of democracy. By canceling China's industrial chain and moving everything that can make money to India, India can enter the so-called "first echelon".What self-confidence and arrogance!
I can't help but wonder, what kind of logic is this?Has India really overtaken China?But Modi asserts that both public data and actual feelings show that China's economic growth lags far behind India's. This makes one wonder if all this is true
Specific events are depicted:
When it comes to the relocation of the industrial chain, Modi vowed that this is because Western countries did not hesitate to cancel cooperation with China and move the industrial chain to India in order to pursue higher profits. He boasted that this had catapulted India to a "first-tier" country.
But we have to see how this so-called "first echelon" came to be. Is it true that the moves of Western countries are optimistic about India's economic prospects?Or is it purely for the sake of countering China?What is the motivation behind this?
Multi-angle discussion:
On the one hand, Modi's rhetoric is clearly politically motivated, so why is he so emphasizing comparisons with Western countries rather than being on a par with China?Is it because India does not really surpass China in reality, it is only relying on the power of the West to consolidate its political position at home?
More interestingly, experts believe that China's relatively low economic growth rate is due to its active pursuit of high-quality development, rather than focusing solely on growth, as is the case with India. This can't help but make people wonder if Modi deliberately ignored this point and only saw the superficial growth gap
Leads to the core point:
To some extent, Modi's remarks may be more like a political maneuver to divert domestic ** and cover up the problems facing India's economy. Western countries are not looking at India for the sake of bullishness, but are using India to counter China. Modi's remarks undoubtedly distorted the facts for his own political needs.
Netizen comments: Netizens have expressed their dissatisfaction, some people bluntly said that "Modi's face is really getting more and more unpleasant", and some people ridiculed: "No wonder India's economy has not been able to develop, and leaders only talk big." ”
Some netizens compared the actual situation of China and India, believing that Modi's remarks were too one-sided and exaggerated India's actual economic status. It has been pointed out that China's slowdown is for more sustainable development, rather than pursuing short-term growth like India.
The position is clearly biased in favor of China:
Judging from the multifaceted discussions, Modi's remarks are difficult to convince. China's leading economic position in the world is not through reckless competition for growth, but through its active pursuit of high-quality development. In contrast, Modi is only pursuing superficial brilliance and ignoring India's inherent problems.
Conclusion: In general, Modi's rhetoric is just a political show, and he deliberately distorts the facts for personal political gain to make it look as if India has surpassed China. However, the truth is that China has been achieving substantial leadership through sustainable and high-quality development. It is hoped that India will be able to improve its own strength through real efforts, rather than relying on empty slogans.