Several issues that should be paid attention to in the sampling inspection and disposal of edible agricultural products
As a grassroots official, the author has participated in many case discussions, and among these cases that have risen to the discussion of the case trial committee, the number of cases with excessive pesticide residues is the largest proportion. On the one hand, there are four strictest principle requirements, and on the other hand, there is a considerable reduction in punishment due to excessive punishment, so these seemingly small cases have risen to the level of the case trial committee for adjudication. For the sampling inspection of edible agricultural products, on the one hand, there is a lack of reasonable and effective organization of the sampling work;At the same time, there is also a lack of correct science popularization of sampling results related to food safety;In the whole process of closed management of the whole chain of supervision, it is basically caught in the dilemma of a penalty. This article may be biased, but I sincerely invite you to think about it at the grassroots level**.
There is a lack of effective organization for the sampling of edible agricultural products.
For the sampling inspection of edible agricultural products, many places entrust a third party to conduct sampling inspection through the purchase of services, and the local market supervision department cooperates. In order to efficiently complete the sampling task, many third-party sampling inspections have become "random inspections" for the sake of "random inspections", such as avoiding the most important place - the wholesale market during the sampling process, because the work of the wholesale market is carried out in the second half of the night, and there are time conflicts and inconveniences.
For example, there is a certain degree of randomness in the sampling process, "you can smoke whatever you want"Anyway, as a third party, you only need to complete the "sampling" task, and it doesn't matter if you ...... the restTherefore, in reality, many places dispose of unqualified cases of pesticide residue sampling, the sampling base and value are probably very pitiful, dozens or hundreds of dollars of value, but the corresponding is a fine of 50,000 yuan, I have to say, this kind of sampling organization for sampling and sampling has a certain unreasonableness. In reality, a large wholesaler corresponds to a number of scattered and weak retail terminals, these terminals in the case of the implementation of the purchase and sale ledger of the certificate and ticket is basically zero, the possibility of repeated sampling is very large, and the real investigation and punishment of the corresponding subject "has nothing to do with themselves", and the terminal to beg for life of the stall hawkers become the "wronged head".
Afterthought of sampling of edible agricultural products.
The sampling inspection of edible agricultural products vividly reflects the meaning of the words "fast, accurate, and ruthless", but its real meaning is: fast and inaccurate, accurate but not fast, and the punishment is ruthless enough!The basis of administrative punishment must be and can only be a test report issued by an authoritative organization, and cannot be punished with a rapid inspection conclusion. In the process of handling the sampling inspection of agricultural products, the time difference between getting the unqualified test report and the sampling inspection is huge, that is to say, when we want to punish a case of excessive pesticide residues, these unqualified agricultural products have already completed the whole process of the "digestive system", there is no "surplus" goods, and the rest is just a dry ......Blunt ......Icy punishment. This is similar to the feeling of finding half a worm in the middle of eating an apple, and often the grass-roots market supervision can only be punished in accordance with the procedural provisions to hand over the errand, but from the perspective of the penalty information publicity system, many places have made a decision not to impose administrative penalties in accordance with Article 136 of the Food Safety Law for similar cases, I think it reflects the responsibility of the grassroots and the helplessness of the grassroots......
There is a lack of effective science popularization in the sampling inspection of edible agricultural products
Chlorpyrifos sounds scary......Imidacloprid, sounds disgusting......But do you know the process of random inspection?Are the supervisors aware of the sampling process?After the author was in charge, I specifically consulted and asked the sampling agency about this matter, and one of the very important and very simple pieces of information was not clear to everyoneThe vegetables and fruits sampled and used for inspection of edible agricultural products are all vegetables and fruits that have not been washed and soaked!!The results of the sampling test are very unappetizing, but can it be confirmed that these vegetables and fruits still have such a high residual amount after washing and soaking?I don't have a very professional and detailed test report to confirm my point of view, but the basic conclusion I have drawn is that the pesticide residue indicators will basically change relatively large after cleaning and soakingHeavy metal indicators are mostly soil, water quality, and environmental problems, and cleaning and soaking have little effect - the popularization of this kind of knowledge is extremely important, and it is also necessary to know and master market supervision.
In general, the sampling inspection of edible agricultural products is not fortified in advance;The problems found in the sampling inspection are also very limited;However, the guiding significance and counter-effect of whole-chain supervision on work are very limited. In fact, on the issue of edible agricultural products, rapid inspection should be the mainstream, fines are by no means an effective means, the positive action of the agricultural and rural departments is the root of the source, the problem is in the fields and farms, otherwise it is just the internal volume of market supervision to consume, for the poisonous celery, there is really not much value. (* Dry at the base level).