Recently, an incident about the "luxury cars" in a public rental housing community in Xianyang City, Shaanxi Province has attracted widespread attention from all walks of life. The incident originated from a case of affordable housing application fraud, in which Mr. Wang, a citizen, applied for public rental housing through an intermediary company, but found that the house had not been processed again for more than a year, and the 25,000 yuan handed over to the intermediary was not returned. Mr. Wang had no choice but to pass the matter, and mentioned in the report that the public rental housing community was "full of luxury cars".
After the report, the local ** said that it had issued a police report on December 17, 2023, and was investigating the intermediary company's suspected public rental housing fraud and soliciting clues from the public. Recently, however, when a journalist went to investigate the neighborhood again, he encountered an unpleasant experience. In the interview, the reporter mentioned that public rental housing is affordable housing for low-income people, and the total vehicle price tax shall not exceed 150,000 yuan, but there are luxury brand cars in the community, how to explain this?
The reporter came to the Xianyang Affordable Housing Management Center to seek a response, and a man said in an interview that he should not just look at the brand, but should pay attention to the purchase of vehicles. For example, he said that someone spent 120,000 yuan to buy a 10-year-old Audi, although it is a luxury brand, the total price and tax is still less than 150,000 yuan, which is in line with the regulations. In addition, he also mentioned that many residents in the community are drivers and will drive the boss's car back to the community at night. Therefore, the man believes that there is no illegal allocation of public rental housing in the community.
However, such an answer is obviously far-fetched and unconvincing. When the reporter continued to ask the man whether he had a comprehensive grasp of the whole incident, the man became emotional, and even scolded in front of the investigators of the Commission for Discipline Inspection and the Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development: "Get out!."Who gives you the right to point fingers here. Such an attitude is clearly aimed at covering up the truth and intimidating journalists. However, after this scene was taken by reporters, it made the situation even bigger.
For this incident, it has caused a wide range of heated discussions on the Internet. Many netizens expressed disbelief and even doubted whether the Housing and Urban-Rural Development Department also hired temporary workers to participate in the investigation. It is difficult to believe that such public servants can give an impartial result when they participate in the investigation. Therefore, the truth of the incident remains to be revealed.
Similar incidents have occurred in the past. In some places, the allocation of public rental housing is illegal and unfair, or the distribution is not carried out in accordance with the regulations due to the network, such as private subletting. Such incidents not only damage the image of social fairness and justice, but also deprive low-income people who are truly in need of their rights.
The concern and controversy caused by this incident have had a certain impact on society. First of all, the public has increased their attention, paying more attention to the allocation of public rental housing, and questioning the work of relevant departments. Secondly, the incident has also condemned the behavior of some illegal intermediary companies, and intensified the crackdown on affordable housing fraud. Finally, the investigation of intermediary companies and relevant department personnel is also expected to be finalized, which provides a reference and basis for the investigation and handling of similar incidents.
At this time, it is not known whether there is an update on the incident. However, this incident has attracted widespread public attention and discussion, making the issue of public rental housing allocation a hot topic in society again. The impact on the whole event, we need to be objective.
4.Regarding the partnership between affordable housing authorities and intermediary companies, how do you think the supervision should be strengthened?