The situation on the Ukrainian front has taken on a new turn on the occasion of Zelensky's visit to the United States. FaceRussian armyThe Ukrainian army was forced to withdraw part of its positions in Maryinka, Avdiivka and other directions, givingRussian armyMoving forward creates opportunities. Especially in the main direction of attack in AvadiivkaRussian armyIn one fell swoop, it tried to achieve a strategic encirclement of the urban area. And in some other directions,Russian armySome results have also been achieved. In the Marinka region,Russian armyAlmost complete control of the entire town, and flags were raised in some places. In the western region of Zaporozhye region and in the direction of Kherson,Russian armySome progress has also been made.
The evacuation of the Ukrainian army is largely aimed at reducing, reducing material consumption, and trying to maintain the front until the arrival of a new ** scale of assistance. Ukrainian armyExhaustion, unable to continue to launch a large-scale counterattack, and constrained by the lack of Western aid. Despite the limited counterattacks of the Ukrainian army on several fronts, the results were not ideal. The withdrawal of Ukrainian troops may also be related to Kyiv's overall strategic adjustment.
In the plight of the Ukrainian army, U.S. Zelensky made a third visit to the United States in an attempt to save the countryPoliticsThe aid bill to Ukraine that has been stranded by the struggle. However, due to the congressional recess, among other reasons, Zelensky seems to have failed to achieve the expected goals. He was only offered a new aid package totaling $200 million, and it was probably one of the last U.S. bailouts it could provide. This aid is only enough for the Ukrainian army to maintain the front for a short time. At the time of the congressional vote, the Republican Party demanded that Biden increase border protection spending in exchange for the passage of the aid to Ukraine bill, which led to the bill being vetoed.
For Ukraine,PoliticsThe conditions for resolving the crisis are gradually ripe, but there are still differences between the two sides on the issue of the bottom line of peace talks, as well as the potential impact of the NATO bloc. Neither Russia nor Ukraine is willing to take the first crucial first step. Therefore, the tug-of-war on the battlefield will continue until a major turning point occurs.
The change in the situation on the front line in Ukraine shows that the Ukrainian army is thereRussian armywas at a significant disadvantage under the offensive and was forced to withdraw from several positions. The retreat of the Ukrainian army shows that its combat effectiveness has been seriously weakened and cannot be matchedRussian armyConduct a long-term confrontation. WhileRussian armytook advantage of this opportunity to expand the scope of its territorial control.
Zelensky's visit to the United States did not receive enough assistance as expected, which is undoubtedly a blow to Ukraine. The Ukrainian side is inInternationalSocial support is weakening, and it is difficult to continue the confrontation due to the lack of materials and manpowerRussian armycapacity.
As can be seen from the changes on the battlefield in Ukraine, Ukraine needs moreInternationalsupport to strengthen its combat capabilities. However, due toInternationalandPoliticsThe impact of the struggle, external support is not as sufficient as the Ukrainian side would have liked.
In this case, Ukraine may need to reassess its strategy and think about its adoptionPoliticsPossibility of conflict resolution through means. Although there are clear differences between the two sides on the bottom line of peace talks, a peaceful negotiated solution may be a more viable option, given the high cost of the conflict.
In any case, the resolution of the conflict in Ukraine requiresInternationalExtensive participation and joint efforts of the society. A lasting and stable peace can only be achieved if all parties find a common solution through dialogue and compromise.