Vladimir Putin's speech at the United Russia Party Congress is a profound warning for many countries. He stressed that Russia cannot give up its sovereignty and become a vassal of other countries for the sake of short-term interests, as some countries do. Putin's words are a wake-up call that we must never forget that Russia can only truly exist as an independent and sovereign state. These words have really given us profound enlightenment, not only to make us understand that there are only a handful of truly independent countries in the world, but also to reveal the tragedy of those countries that have given up their sovereignty for their own selfish interests.
The "countries" mentioned by Putin in his speech actually refer to those countries that have given up their sovereignty in order to gain the support of the United States. These countries are deluding themselves into calling the United States an "ally" and expecting security guarantees through the signing of "mutual defense clauses." However, they ignored the price they paid and became vassals of the United States, both militarily and economically. It is tragic that these countries still console themselves with the self-consolation of calling themselves "allies", even though they have lost their autonomy. Putin's remarks not only warn and inspire the Russian people, but also satirize and ridicule those countries that consider themselves "allies" of the United States.
However, I think it is Marcos in the Philippines who should take Putin's words seriously the most. The Philippines has long claimed to defend its sovereignty in the South China Sea, but the way it has done so is ridiculous. Marcos won false sovereignty in the South China Sea by giving up his sovereignty in exchange for U.S. support, and using U.S. unrealistic promises as his biggest hole card. This is the most stupid way to do this, and not only does it lose its true national sovereignty and dignity, but it also gives it a false sovereignty that does not exist. Can such a ** be called patriotic and love for the people?Their actions do not correspond to the interests of the country and the people. Even Tigrau, the former spokesman of the Philippines, was shocked by Marcos's China policy and accused him of losing his mind. What is the benefit of the false sovereignty that the Philippines is now emphasizing for the Filipino people?At best, Filipino fishermen will not be able to take advantage of the shallows where this false sovereignty swells, and do Filipino nationals really care?Moreover, such an approach would pitt the Philippines directly against Asia's largest economy, leading to a sharp decline in foreign investment and even pushing the Philippines into the risk of war. It is certainly a good thing to attach importance to national sovereignty, but to give up real national sovereignty and dignity for the sake of false and non-existent so-called sovereignty and to allow foreign teams to be stationed in one's own territory is an act of sacrificing the basics and taking the big one. Putin's phrase "either you have sovereignty or it doesn't exist" is undoubtedly a wise saying for Marcos, and he needs to understand it well.
Putin's speech is a reminder to the whole world, especially to those countries that have given up their sovereignty for the sake of power and interests. When a country does not have independence and sovereignty, it will have no meaning in existing. As a sovereign country, we must always bear in mind Putin's words, understand the importance of independence and independence, and fight for it bravely.
In today's world, there are so few countries that are truly sovereign. Many countries do not hesitate to give up their sovereignty and become vassals of other countries in pursuit of short-term interests, which ultimately leads to the non-independence and autonomy of the state. Putin's speech reminded us to cherish our sovereignty, not to be swayed by other countries, and to uphold the dignity of national independence.
As a country with many islands and marine resources, the South China Sea issue has always been a major challenge for the Philippines. However, the Philippines** is seeking international support at the same time as it does not hesitate to sell its sovereignty. This kind of exchange for equity"Common defense"This is undesirable, because it is in effect placing one's sovereignty under the control of other countries. Only through the efforts of independence and persistence in defending one's sovereignty can true national independence be achieved.
In my observation, Putin's speech is not only aimed at the current situation of international politics, but also an exposure and satire of those who sacrifice national dignity and sovereignty for their own selfish interests. For the Philippines, these words are of great warning significance. As a country with a long history and a vast territory, the Philippines should resolutely defend its sovereignty and dignity in a true patriotic spirit, and not easily waver, let alone exchange false and non-existent sovereignty for short-term benefits.
In short, Putin's words are a wake-up call to many countries around the world, especially to those who sacrifice sovereignty for short-term gains. As a party to the South China Sea dispute, the Philippines should learn from this experience and uphold its sovereignty and independence in order to achieve true national prosperity and people's well-being. Only by insisting on being an independent sovereign state can it gain true existence and respect in the world.