Why there are some long-delayed petition backlogs and uncontrollable petitioning groups in the local government, and some petition problems that have been more than 10 years or even decades are due to historical reasons, some are due to mechanism problems, but the formation of some petition backlogs and petitioning groups is still caused by the psychology and wrong thinking of this group of people.
Now let's analyze the general psychological state of the people involved:
1. Take the situation you think is a fact or even evidence to make unreasonable demands to **.
Many of the interviewees either through hearsay or through false rumors, in the self-hypnosis day and night, disjointed from various sources, and constantly gave themselves ** and hints about the words and even Internet rumors that they thought were beneficial to themselves, and continued to enhance the legitimacy and reasonableness of the so-called self-assertion, and blocked themselves from other cases or legal provisions that were unfavorable to themselves, and did not listen to or read them.
2. Don't believe in the law, don't believe in the policy, don't believe in **, but listen to the gossip and the words of other people of the same kind.
With the change of time and space for policies, and the delay in the process of the visitor, including but not limited to entering Beijing, excessive actions leading to being cracked down and dealt with in accordance with the law, etc., the petitioner involved in ** and the replacement of staff at all levels of various departments and levels have a resistance and even confrontation psychology, coupled with the exchange of experience between people of the same kind and have a common language, so that there is a crisis of trust.
3. The ideological understanding of "fear of loss, fear of being deceived, and fear of not being taken seriously" has also become the biggest obstacle to communication with the interviewers.
The interviewers seem to be a vulnerable group, but in fact, from the perspective of the current system, the biggest vulnerable group is actually the local government, not only because the construction of the rule of law has achieved results in recent years, but also because the party and the party have always been prepared to settle the matter with the original intention of "internal contradictions among the people", however, the interviewer is thinking that since he has embarked on the road of petitioning, the achievement of the appeal cannot be perfunctory, and it has not been solved for so long, so he will try his best to make the first person pay attention to it, and do everything to meet his own requirements.
Compared with the people involved, there are also some erroneous ideas in the field of social stability
1. The form of maintaining regional social stability depends on "blocking" rather than "sparse".
The local government has put the daily management of the backlog of petition cases and the petitioners into the field of maintaining social stability, and has reduced the situation of people going to Beijing with the so-called territorial management model, which has formed a "blocking" effect over time, and then has given the petitioners the illusion that "you are afraid that I will go to Beijing, and you will attach importance to me as long as I go." Coupled with the superficial pursuit of regional social stability, this has led to the intensification of such a wrong management model.
2. Ignoring the decisive factors of the "treatment" link in the "three-in-place and one-processing".
The general principle of "three in place and one handling" is correct, but when applied to the backlog of letters and visits and the situation where the petitioners touch the red line, they have encountered a simple problem, that is, the backlog of petitions has a long-term and continuous nature, resulting in the petitioners generally either being too old and exceeding the age limit in the scope of social security administrative punishments, or being unable to "deal with them" due to physical reasons, or being overburdened due to family reasons, and once the "punishment" will affect the normal living conditions of other people in the family, and so on.
3. Selectively ignoring the role of the unit, bias emphasizing the principle of territorial management.
In fact, many of the precipitated petition backlog are more or less related to the actions of the ** functional departments, but the superior attributes of the functional departments are more important than the subordinate territorial units, so they can only focus on the principle of territorial management to transmit the pressure to the next level, forming a situation where the matter does not matter (petition backlog), and the territory cannot manage the situation.
The misplaced ideas of the two sides are intertwined, and in the end, the petition backlog is still the petition backlog, the petitioner is still the petitioner, and the petitioner wants to "pay" for what has been done or as a "bill", so who has to "pay" for the cost of maintaining social stability over the years?Everything has two sides, a slap does not make a sound, the solution of anything needs to return to the rational level to re-examine, in order to be properly resolved, I hope that day will come soon.