The masterpiece may not be written by Cao Xueqin, and the research direction may be subverted!
Suddenly learned a shocking piece of information, Qing historian Nan Bingwen, Chinese Academy of Sciences Cultural Relics Research Center Su Rong, Yangzhou University College of Literature Professor Wan Qingchuan, and Shandong Zouping Cao Dongfang jointly revealed the true version of "Dream of Red Mansions", proving that the author is not Cao Xueqin, but Zhu Cixing, the fourth son of Emperor Chongzhen of the Ming Dynasty. If true, it will be a shock, and the study of red science may be completely changed.
Cao Xueqin is not the author?Four Pieces of Evidence Reveal the Truth!
Flipping through this striking article, four pieces of evidence are cited, all of which are intended to prove that the author of "Dream of Red Mansions" is not a descendant of the Cao family of Jiangnan weaving, but Zhu Cixing, the fourth son of Emperor Chongzhen of the Ming Dynasty. This will completely change the perception of the author of "Dream of the Red Chamber" and lead historians to a new chapter in their research.
The first evidence: Deng Hanyi's poems reveal the author's era!
The article first uses the late Ming poet Deng Hanyi's poem "The only death through the ages, and the sad lady is alone", and concludes that the author should be born and died in the late Ming Dynasty. This view is supported by a quote from Dream of the Red Chamber, which argues that if the author lived in the Yongqian period, he should quote more recent works. However, it is worth pondering whether the justification for judging the author's age by a single line of poetry is convincing enough.
The second evidence: The mystery of the authorship of "Dream of Red Mansions"!
Article 2 of the article points out that the interpretation of the authorship of Dream of Red Mansions diverges in different versions, from the Jiazhu version to the Jiachen version, and until Hu Shih's research in the early 20th century, the author has not been determined. In this regard, the article cites the Jiazhu Ben Baowen and points out that Liu Quanfu is the collector of the Jiazhu Ben, rather than the author's witness. This view aims to question the claim that Cao Xueqin is the author, but whether it is enough to overturn the research of later generations still needs to be analyzed in depth.
The third evidence: green inlaid gold Ding Yi, the connection between the royal family and the author?
The third piece of evidence relates to the green and gold Dingyi, which points out that the artifact destroyed by Emperor Chongzhen at the fall of the Ming Dynasty is consistent with the royal object described in The Dream of the Red Chamber. However, the article mentions that there are also official kiln artifacts in Jiafu and other places, questioning whether this is enough to prove that the author of "Dream of Red Mansions" had a direct connection with the royal family.
Fourth evidence: The autobiographical nature of "Dream of Red Mansions" reveals the author's life experience!
The last piece of evidence claims that Dream of the Red Chamber is autobiographical, revealing the author's life history and proving that he is Zhu Cixing, the son of Emperor Chongzhen and Tian Guifei. The article argues that the record in Yurui's anthology "Zao Window Idle Brush" is more credible, but more evidence is still needed to present whether this statement is sufficient.
Dream of Red Mansions said that the mystery may not yet be revealed!
Overall, the four pieces of evidence presented in this article are not strong enough to overturn Cao Xueqin's claim that she is the author of Dream of the Red Chamber. Historians still need to dig deeper, and we look forward to more conclusive evidence for Dream of the Red Chamber, a classic of global Chinese studies. Until more information is available, we should remain cautious about this astonishing discovery and wait for more experts and scholars to study it in depth.
Conclusion: The mystery of Dream of Red Mansions may reveal the truth!
This research may be shocking, but with the further efforts of historians, there may be more unsolved mysteries to be uncovered about the truth of the Dream of the Red Chamber. Let's look forward to whether this pinnacle of Chinese literature will unveil more mysteries in new research.
The truth of Dream of Red Mansions revealed!Historians have discovered that Zhu Cixing may be the true author?The article has attracted a lot of attention with its striking themes and rigorous arguments. Differing views have been expressed in anticipation of this groundbreaking idea.
First of all, the four major evidences mentioned in the article, namely Deng Hanyi's poems, the mystery of the authorship of Dream of the Red Chamber, the green inlaid with Jin Dingyi, and the autobiographical nature of Dream of the Red Chamber, do provide some theoretical basis for this new theory. However, commentators have generally questioned the persuasiveness of this evidence. For example, the idea of using a single line of Deng Hanyi's poem as a basis to determine the author's era seems a bit far-fetched. This has raised some doubts about this new finding, which must be supported by deeper research and more evidence.
Second, the article's reference to Cao Xueqin's non-authorship has sparked widespread controversy. Cao Xueqin has long been recognized as the author of Dream of the Red Chamber, and the subversive nature of this view has been difficult for many to accept. The article argues that the contradictions in Hu Shih's early 20th-century research and other versions do not sufficiently prove that Cao Xueqin is the author, but commentators point out that the complexity and diversity of historical research make it difficult to answer this question.
In addition, the correspondence between the green and green inlaid gold Ding Yi mentioned in the article and the royal objects in "Dream of Red Mansions" has also been questioned somewhat. Although this view has been tried to explain through the example of official kiln artifacts in places such as Jiafu, commentators have argued that this does not fully explain the author's identity.
Finally, the article concludes with a call for caution to treat this new discovery and wait for more in-depth research by experts and scholars. This suggestion is widely accepted, as any new discovery involving a literary canon needs to be supported by in-depth scholarly research and multifaceted evidence.
Overall, the essay provokes a new perspective on the authorship of Dream of the Red Chamber with its compelling title and in-depth arguments. However, more evidence and more in-depth research are needed to determine whether this new theory can shake the traditional view of Cao Xueqin as the author of Dream of the Red Chamber.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!