Love and marriage are the eternal topics of human beings, carrying people's dreams and pursuits. However, in today's materialistic society, marriage is often given more utilitarian overtones and determines one's fate. In 2014, a college student Zhou Lanjun caused huge attention and controversy in the variety show "Blind Date to Win" because she publicly stated that she had to marry the rich second generation. The fermentation of this incident reflects the complex attitudes of society towards marriage and money relations at that time.
Zhou Lanjun was still a college student at the time, and participated in the show "Blind Date to Win", and attracted everyone's attention with her confidence and charm. But her sentence "non-50 million rich second generation does not marry" caused an uproar, she explained that her dream needs a lot of financial support, and said that she does not attach much importance to the relationship, thinking that it can be slowly cultivated after marriage. Zhou Lanjun's remarks have caused widespread discussion and controversy in the society, and her self-confidence and dedication to marrying the second generation of the rich are impressive, however, her understanding of feelings has caused controversy. This phenomenon reflects the complex attitudes of society towards marriage and money relations at the time.
Subsequently, Zhou Lanjun went on a blind date on the Jiayuan website many times, and according to the ** evaluation, she can marry someone with assets of 20 million. However, Zhou Lanjun was not satisfied with this standard, insisting that he was worthy of marrying a rich second generation with 50 million assets. Although the blind date program team arranged for her to meet the rich second generation many times, the results were not satisfactory. Her words are outspoken, and she puts forward expectations for the future of the wealthy second-generation family, including financial support for entrepreneurship. However, this direct statement was not accepted by the rich second generation, who believed that she should be more cautious and should not be too open and honest at the beginning. Zhou Lanjun was questioned for this reason and was considered too critical.
Ms. Zhou's remarks and actions have caused widespread repercussions online, with many people believing that she is not as beautiful as she says she is and being critical of her demands. Her exaggerated rhetoric was considered to be a deliberate hype, trying to gain fame. Zhou Lanjun's remarks on social ** have received widespread attention, and she has been accused of being too snobbish, and some people even think that her appearance and talent are not enough to demand such a high threshold. Under the verbal criticism of netizens, she finally came forward to apologize, admitting that her remarks affected social concepts.
However, seven years have passed, and Zhou Lanjun has not given up his pursuit of himself because of the controversy. Today, she has obtained an advanced certificate in business English and has become the legal representative of a network technology company, showing her perseverance. She has achieved excellent results in her studies, received several awards, and has also received high praise from her teachers. Compared with the original view of marriage, she seems to have found her own more independent and valuable development direction. This process also made her gradually realize that in addition to marriage, she can also achieve more possibilities through hard work.
Up, Zhou Lanjun's story shows a young man's persistence and pursuit of marriage. Her remarks sparked controversy in society, but she also recognized her own shortcomings, and through hard work, she succeeded in counterattacking. This incident has had a certain impact on society, making people re-examine the complexity of marriage and money relationships. Marriage should not be just about money, but should be based on mutual understanding and respect. Love and marriage should be sincere and persistent, and should not become a tool for utilitarianism and interests.
In this realistic society with a view of marriage, how should we view marriage?Should marriage be just an exchange of financial benefits?Please leave your views and comments and discuss this topic with us.