"Cancel the open class demonstration class", Wang Xuming condemned formalism and guessed how much interest there was behind it
China's education has experienced a hundred years of development, accumulated a lot of valuable experience, each class has its own unique value, each teaching method is the predecessors of the hard work to explore and inherit. However, at the same time, there are many modern and innovative teaching methods, which have led to a gradual improvement in the level of education and a more complete education system.
As the saying goes, "remove the dross, take the essence!"."Nowadays, the school system has been well developed, and every subject has a systematic teaching arrangement, and every class is of paramount importance. Recently, however, Wang Xuming, a former spokesperson of the Ministry of Education and former president of the Language Society, put forward some views on the school's open classes and demonstration classes.
Wang Xuming advocated "canceling open classes and demonstration classes", believing that this was an infringement of students' rights and interests. "Teaching should not be a performance, all kinds of open classes, demonstration classes should be canceled, students should not be tortured, these so-called open classes and demonstration classes just bring students from the classroom to the podium to perform, this is a violation of students' rights and interests!Wang Xuming said in a program.
This form of teaching has been passed down for many years, and the open classes are mainly based on teachers and students, and school leaders and other teachers evaluate the ability of the teachers by listening to the lectures. From the teacher's point of view, many teachers agreed with Wang Xuming's statement. Usually, during public classes, teachers need to prepare in advance, and students should not be idle, and they must repeatedly cooperate with the teacher's lectures, which often requires repeated rehearsals.
It's torture for the teacher, but it's something that has to be done, and it has to be done well, and there must be no mistakes. From a student's point of view, it means that they have to listen to the same class multiple times, but they can't understand what the teacher is saying. In this performance, the teacher's audience is the superior leaders and teaching researchers, the students become the victims, and the teachers are the forced executors, so who is the beneficiary?
Such classes do not help to improve teachers' teaching ability, nor do they have substantive significance for students' learning Xi. To put it more bluntly, open classes are just a form for teachers who are eager to perform, but they are limited to formalism.
Open classes are a condition for evaluating teachers' titles and famous teachers, and it is not easy to cancel them. Teachers do not have the right to refuse open classes, because the evaluation of professional titles usually requires proof of quality courses, and this certificate is usually obtained by participating in various quality class competitions, including provincial and county levels. With this certificate, you are qualified to evaluate professional titles and famous teachers.
It may be very difficult to cancel an open class, but if it is not canceled, it must change the essence and return the focus of the open class to teachers and students. Each teacher only needs to attend one or two open classes a year, and for new teachers, listening to old teachers can also gain a lot of experience and know how to teach in the future, which is also a benefit of open classes.
For the students, it was originally intended to make them aware of their mistakes so that they could correct them, but gradually it evolved into early demonstrations. The questions asked by the teacher had already been discussed with the students, and it turned into a pre-rehearsed performance.
Educator Tao Xingzhi once said: "Thousands of teachings, teaching people to seek truth;Learn from thousands of things, learn to be a real person". However, in such performances, students learn how to perform, and lose the essence of truth-seeking, they cannot really grasp the knowledge and can only passively imitate. True education should guide students to learn Xi independently, not rigid patterns.
If this course is abolished, teachers and students will be able to focus fully on teaching and learning Xi itself, reducing unnecessary burdens, no longer wasting time and energy preparing for "performances", and students will be able to achieve better results in a better learning Xi environment.
Education is for students, but in reality, students are the biggest victims. Many people want to cancel, but there is a huge chain of interests involved. The abolition of this system will affect the income of the department, and the abolition of the evaluation of professional titles and famous teachers may make some people unemployed. Although we ordinary people are not able to express a decisive opinion, famous teachers and experts are unwilling to agree to abolish this system. There are indeed too many problems in education, and I hope that the Ministry of Education can pay attention to it, solve the existing problems, and return the classroom to teachers and students. Utilitarian development will only plunge Chinese students into the abyss!This education expert dares to speak up, and he is speaking for thousands of students!He may have offended many people, but we still have to thank Mr. Wang Xuming for daring to stand up. It is hoped that the Ministry of Education will pay attention to the problem and return education to its essence and truly benefit students.
The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any of the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.