In the topic of labor dispatch, friends often focus on visual depictions such as temporary workers and wool coming out of sheep. Of course, these arguments are not unfounded, as there are situations where dispatch companies are looking for profit at the same time. However, today we will not solve these problems, but will deeply analyze the dispatch and employment problems of government agencies, institutions and state-owned enterprises to see if they can really save money.
First of all, we need to clarify the general environment for labor dispatch and employment. The basic units that use dispatch are government agencies, state-owned enterprises, hospitals, schools, railways and other public units, and these units use financial funds regardless of whether they are fully funded or partially subsidized. However, I cannot accept the argument that the use of labor dispatch is to save money. There are several main reasons why the use of dispatched personnel does not save money:
1. On the whole, the financial expenditure salary is not less than that of direct employment, but it is relative to the personnel in the establishment. As for government agencies and state-owned enterprises, the so-called financial savings are actually only aimed at the personnel within the establishment or regular employees, and we have to admit that the annual expenditure is indeed not small. However, in the context of the increasing demand for personnel in society, employers often need to expand their recruitment. However, in an environment of strict staffing, it is difficult to create new staff. In this way, the labor dispatch personnel are regarded by the employer as the main body of recruitment. In fact, the real cost of saving money here is not necessarily less than the use of direct signing, and there is no need to be a regular worker in the establishment or the so-called regular worker, even if it is just a contract worker, at least it is signed with the employer, which can be regarded as protecting the rights and interests of some workers.
Second, the cost of identity management and time increases, and a certain amount of management fees need to be paid. When it comes to labor dispatch, we have to mention the word middleman, and the dispatch company must survive as an enterprise, and in the case of a fixed budget, it can only be wool out of the sheep. However, in terms of finance, the overall cost is not a lot at all. The author was fortunate to participate in an examination of a government unit, and the total budget and the amount received by the recruitment were almost doubled, and the overall salary was really good, but after deducting the expenses of insurance, personnel management, training and other expenses from the dispatch company, the actual salary received was not much. It can be seen that the intermediate expenses are wasted in vain, but is it a financial waste compared to direct signing?
To sum up, we cannot simply assume that the use of labor dispatch can save money when it comes to the dispatch of government agencies, public institutions, and state-owned enterprises. In fact, the use of dispatched employees not only does not save financial expenses, but also increases administrative costs and time costs. Therefore, we should look at the issue of labor dispatch and employment more rationally, and not simply see it as a means to save money.