Zelensky's first visit to the United States encountered unexpected difficulties and became the focus of controversy on the American political scene. His visit was originally intended to win more support, but when the United States expressed its friendship, it attracted criticism from members of Congress. There seems to be an undercurrent behind all this, which is not only closely related to the political struggle within the United States, but also because of some of Zelensky's radical words and deeds in his interaction with the United States.
The bombardment of Zelensky by US lawmakers has put him under pressure during his trip to the United States, and various doubts and accusations have been emerging. Judging from the reaction of congressmen, this may have something to do with the political struggle between the Republican Party and the Democratic Party in the United States. At the same time, some of Zelensky's own tough remarks and excesses may have contributed to this political turmoil to some extent. Biden's invitation was originally intended to strengthen cooperation between the two countries, but Zelensky's performance in Washington seems to have planted a political minefield for himself.
Ups and downs in the political rapids
Zelensky's visit to the United States has become a farce that cannot be ignored in the political arena. Unlike previous warm welcomes, this time the delicate situation has sparked widespread speculation. Zelensky tried to win over the country by criticizing US lawmakers, but unfortunately this strategy did not work. Ukraine** may have ignored his marginal position in the U.S. political system and tried to take a hard line with aggressive rhetoric, which could have backfired.
Ukraine**'s behavior during his visit to the United States raises questions about whether he understands the rules of the diplomatic game. His arrogant attitude and overly aggressive rhetoric have caused the United States to maintain a polite attitude towards him, but it has aroused obvious resentment among congressional Republicans. At a time when the internal strife in the United States is fierce, Zelensky's behavior may only exacerbate the contradictions, and the original intention of winning support for Ukraine may be covered up.
Zelenskyy's overdependence on the United States could be a huge miscalculation in his political career. With the support of the United States as his faith, he may have ignored the complex role of the United States in international affairs and the balance of interests. Especially against the backdrop of the current changes in international relations, the United States is no longer the unshakable supporter of the past. Zelenskyy's overly tough posture during his visit to the United States may make him pay a heavier political price.
Zelensky's political miscalculations
The warm reception of Zelensky by the United States seems to have continued unabated, but in the corners of Congress, the discontent of Republicans has spread like a shadow. This phenomenon may seem somewhat unexpected to outsiders, but behind the fact is a complex plot of internal political struggle in the United States.
The current tensions and conflicts in the Middle East show a clear geopolitical pattern, which can be divided into a small Israeli siege of Gaza and a large Israeli siege of Israel by the Iranian-dominated Shiite arc. In the mini-siege, Israel has sought to reduce the scope of the Palestinian resistance through multiple sorties, ground offences and a total blockade of Gaza. In the Great Encirclement, the Shiite Arc, composed of Iran and other forces, adopted a north-south flanking strategy, which restricted the movement of the IDF and even imposed a blockade at sea, causing serious distress to Israel.
In the mini-siege, Israel made tactical adjustments, dividing the Gaza region into three parts and imposing a total blockade in an attempt to keep the Palestinians in a difficult position. In the Great Siege, the Shiite Arc has successfully weakened Israel through ongoing skirmishes and naval blockades, demonstrating mastery of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.
The Houthis have declared that they will further strengthen the naval blockade of Israel and extend the scope of attacks to all ships associated with Israel, which has had a huge impact on Israel's maritime transportation. This situation poses serious challenges for the Israeli economy, in particular the naval blockade, which has led to a sharp increase in freight and insurance costs. Israel, which used to rely heavily on foreign trade, is now facing external pressure and difficulties.
The Houthi actions could upend Israel's original siege plan, making it difficult for it to gradually subdue Gaza through a protracted war, and it could become a difficult party to maintain. The actual impact of a naval blockade is unclear and could trigger international disputes and put unpredictable pressure on third countries. In these two encirclements in the Middle East, it is still unknown which side will have the last laugh, and it is worth paying close attention.
The conflict in the Middle East has escalated, and the geopolitical power competition has intensified. In the midst of the tense war, Israel has shown its flexibility with unexpected tactical adjustments. Through a multi-faceted attack and a partition and encirclement, Israel is trying to push the Palestinian resistance forces into a desperate situation and challenge their will to resist through the means of "economic siege" imposed by a total blockade. The actual effectiveness of this strategy will take time to assess.
In the Great Encirclement, the Iranian Shiite arc is gradually showing its global influence. It is composed of many forces, and through the tactical means of flanking the north and south, it poses a powerful threat to Israel geographically. In the absence of regular war, the Shiite Arc succeeded in weakening the IDF through skirmishes and even achieved a major victory in the naval blockade. This expansion of global influence not only challenges Israel's security, but also raises broader concerns in the Middle East.