According to Agence France-Presse, Finland's state-owned energy company revealed that Russia will cut off gas to Finland on Saturday morning**. A Kremlin spokesman made it clear that free lunches are a thing of the past, and Russia has taken steps in response to Western sanctions. Finland regrets this, but stresses that it is ready to ensure the stability of the gas transmission network. This is the third European country after Poland and Bulgaria to suffer from Russian natural gas cutoffs.
In early April, in response to Western sanctions, Russia** launched a new mechanism for settling natural gas transactions in rubles. Under the new mechanism, Western buyers will need to open accounts in rubles and foreign currencies with Gazprombank, and pay for gas in the currency of their choice in accordance with the terms of the contract. However, Poland and Bulgaria have explicitly rejected the mechanism, leading to Russia cutting off gas from both countries at the end of April**.
After Russia launched a military operation against Ukraine, Finland actively sought to join NATO. Finland's Solininistö and Prime Minister Sanna Marin said in a joint statement this month that they would apply for NATO membership. Russia has responded explicitly that Finland's accession to NATO poses a direct threat to it and is considering retaliation. Finland's accession to NATO will further exacerbate Russia's strategic worries, which is not conducive to the easing of the situation between Russia and Ukraine, and will inevitably escalate tensions between Russia and Finland, which will have a serious impact on the security of the European region and the world.
In addition to the gas supply cut, Russia abruptly stopped electricity to Finland on the day Finland announced its accession to NATO, citing the arrears of electricity bills from the Nordic branch of the Russian Unified Electricity Import and Export Company**. Finland gets 60% and 70% of its natural gas from Russia every year, and about 10% of its electricity comes from Russia. In 2020, Russia sent about 16 to Finland100 million cubic meters of natural gas, compared to 1.8 billion cubic meters last year.
Russia takes energy as the first and takes measures to cut off gas against unfriendly countries. However, this is also a disservice to Russia itself. Behind the Russia-Ukraine conflict is the competition between the United States and Russia for the European energy market. If there is no Russia-Ukraine conflict, after the completion of the Nord Stream 2 project, Russia's energy to Europe, especially the European Union, will account for more than eighty percent of the European market, basically becoming the dominant player. By provoking the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the United States is trying to squeeze rival Russia out of the European market. Although Russia's gas cut will have an impact on its own economy, in the long run, energy cannot be used lightly.
In-depth analysis: how Russia's gas cutoff is shaking Finland's security landscape and international relations.
Finland's rapid march towards NATO amid the crisis of Russia's natural gas supply cut off has attracted international attention. This move is perceived by Russia as a direct threat and constitutes a serious variable in the security situation in Europe. This article will provide an in-depth analysis of the impact of the Russian energy war on Finland, the geopolitical game behind it, and the battle between the United States and Russia in the European energy market.
Finland's state-owned energy company revealed that Russia will cut off natural gas**, triggering an energy crisis in Finland. A Kremlin spokesman bluntly said that "free lunch" is a thing of the past, and Russia has acted in response to Western sanctions. Finland expressed regret and stressed that preparations were made for the outage to ensure the stability of the gas transmission network. This is the third European country after Poland and Bulgaria to be caught in the cut off of Russian natural gas.
In early April, in response to Western sanctions, Russia launched a new mechanism for settling natural gas in rubles. Western buyers are required to open accounts in rubles and foreign currencies with Gazprom and pay for gas under the contract. However, Poland and Bulgaria have explicitly rejected the mechanism, leading to Russia cutting off gas from both countries at the end of April**.
Finland is actively seeking to join NATO after Russia's military operation against Ukraine. A joint statement by Solininistö and Prime Minister Sanna Marin said they would apply for NATO membership. Russia has clearly responded that Finland's accession to NATO poses a direct threat to it and that it is considering retaliation. Finland's accession to NATO will further exacerbate Russia's strategic concerns, which is not conducive to the easing of the situation between Russia and Ukraine, and will inevitably escalate tensions between Russia and Finland, which will have a serious impact on European and world security.
In addition to the gas supply cut, Russia abruptly stopped electricity to Finland on the day Finland announced its accession to NATO, citing the arrears of electricity bills from the Nordic branch of the Russian Unified Electricity Import and Export Company**. Finland gets 60% and 70% of its natural gas from Russia every year, and about 10% of its electricity comes from Russia. In 2020, Russia sent about 16 to Finland100 million cubic meters of natural gas, compared to 1.8 billion cubic meters last year.
Conclusion: The Finnish crisis is deepening and international relations are turbulent.
The Russian energy dispute has affected Finland's security destiny and has become a new outlet for international relations. Finland's path to NATO has aroused Russia's alarm and become the focus of geopolitical games. As the energy war continues to escalate, the world will become more concerned about Russia's energy strategy and international behavior. The Finnish crisis has become a tipping point on the international stage, indicating the uncertainty and complexity of the situation ahead.
The energy dispute between Russia and Finland has attracted widespread attention from the international community, which not only puts Finland under great pressure on energy, but also highlights the importance of energy in geopolitics. The article mentions that Russia's approach to cutting off natural gas supplies not only poses a threat to Finland, but also reflects the complex wrestling in international relations.
First, Russia's use of natural gas as a political tool has raised widespread concerns about energy security. The article notes that 60% of Finland's annual gas comes from Russia, which means that Finland's dependence on Russia is quite high. The disruption of energy** not only has an impact on industry and life in Finland, but also reveals the country's vulnerability to energy. This is of universal significance on a global scale, many countries have huge demand for energy, and are highly dependent on a few major countries, and this single dependence brings potential security risks to the country.
Secondly, the article touches on the geopolitical dispute between Russia and Finland, especially in the fact that Finland's stated decision to join NATO provoked Russia's **. This shows that energy is not only an economic resource, but also a geopolitical tool. Russia's linking natural gas** to Finland's accession to NATO underscores the role of energy as a bargaining chip in international political wrestling. It also raises questions about whether Russia is overusing energy as a means to impose its geopolitical goals on other countries. In this context, the international community needs to strengthen the diversification of energy sources to reduce its over-dependence on a few major countries.
Finally, the article reveals Russia's scramble for the European energy market, especially with the United States. Russia is trying to dominate the European market by using energy as a **. The United States is trying to squeeze Russia out of the European market by provoking the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. This kind of geopolitical wrestling is particularly evident in the energy field, and it has also put forward deep thinking for the international community on energy strategy. In this competition, it is not only about national security and economic interests, but also about the future development direction of global energy governance.
In general, the energy dispute between Russia and Finland is not only an economic issue between the two countries, but also an important part of geopolitical and international relations. This dispute will trigger deep thinking about energy security, stability of international relations and geopolitical games. In the future, the international community needs to work together to find a more sustainable and diversified energy model** to reduce the geopolitical risks caused by energy.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!