Policy precipitation electricity bills meet a cost nightmare again!One table, one household plan, to

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-01-30

The introduction of policies is often regarded as a powerful tool to improve people's lives, and the reduction of water and electricity bills has also reduced the economic burden of the general public to a certain extent. However, there is concern that the reduction in utility bills is not really benefiting everyone, as the policy hopes. On the contrary, the increase in various costs has become a problem for the general public. In this regard, netizens have said that the biggest problem is that the policy direction is wrong, calling on the hydropower company to implement one meter and one household, meter reading to the household, recharge and prepay directly with the hydropower company to settle, prohibiting the landlord from charging on behalf of the right way!

The direction of the policy is wrong, which is the most direct feeling of netizens about the current policy. The current utility billing model is charged by the landlord on behalf of the landlord, and then the landlord is responsible for handing over to the water and electricity company, which gives the landlord too much room for operation and makes the majority of tenants have no choice. Due to the possible interest relationship between the landlord and the water and electricity company, there is a big loophole in the measurement of water and electricity bills, which leads to unfair sharing of costs and the interests of the masses are infringed.

In response to this problem, hydropower companies should implement a one-meter, one-household scheme. The so-called one meter and one household, that is, each household is equipped with an independent water and electricity meter, which is responsible for recording the water and electricity consumption of the household. This way, each householder has a clear picture of their usage, and the landlord has no control over the metering data. Only real data can provide people with a fair basis for charging and ensure a fair sharing of water and electricity bills.

Not only that, but the one-meter, one-household solution also solves the problems that arise due to landlords charging on their behalf. If this scheme is implemented, each householder will need to settle the prepayment directly with the utility company, bypassing the landlord as an intermediary completely. This can not only effectively prevent landlords from free-riding, tax evasion, but also strengthen the management capacity of hydropower companies and improve the transparency and standardization of charges.

In order to let the majority of netizens better understand the importance of this issue, let's take a look at a specific example. Xiao Ming is a tenant in a community, and most of their electricity consumption is concentrated at night, and the landlord has set their home's electricity consumption time during peak hours. Since the landlord only decides the time of electricity consumption based on his personal wishes, Xiao Ming has to bear the high peak electricity bill, and the increase in the cost makes Xiao Ming's life burden. If Xiao Ming can record his electricity consumption by meter and household, and settle the charges directly with the hydropower company, then he can enjoy fair and reasonable charges, and the burden of living will be reduced.

It can be said that the one-meter-one-household plan is not only in line with the interests of the people, but also an inevitable demand for governance modernization. In this information age, all kinds of data can be accurately measured and recorded by scientific and technological means, and the real data should never be blinded by human factors. ** Hydropower companies should listen to the voices of the people, formulate policies based on the principle of fairness and justice, and solve the cost problem by implementing the one-meter-one-household scheme to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the people.

To sum up, the original intention of the policy to reduce water and electricity bills is good, but the actual effect is far from people's expectations. Through the implementation of the one-meter-one-household scheme, a series of problems encountered in the policy can be solved and a fair and reasonable charging environment can be provided for the people. ** Hydropower companies must think from the perspective of the people, take the law as the criterion, and seek the greatest welfare for the people. As the saying goes, there are policies at the top and countermeasures at the bottom, and only by truly standing on the stand of the people can we formulate policies that conform to reality and achieve social harmony and stability.

Related Pages