Title:
* |Why is the United States cowardly in Iran?Uncovering the truth behind the conflict between the United States and Iran may be the key to changing history!
Recently, the current situation has been turbulent, and US-Iran relations have once again fallen into tension. Every rise and fall is like the beginning of a crisis, stirring up uneasiness and anxiety in people's hearts. Why has the United States never dared to use force against Iran?This is not only a political contest, but also a chess game related to global security and the future of every country and every person.
To understand the complex emotions between the United States and Iran, we must delve into history and look back at past interactions. During the period of friendship between the United States and Iran, the United States supported Iran in establishing a modern pro-Western state, and Iran also contributed geographically to the United States to contain Soviet expansion. However, the Islamic Revolution of 1979 turned all this upside down, and Iran became hostile to the United States, and relations had already entered a hostile phase. This historic shift, like a storm, changed the entire landscape of the Middle East.
Not just historically, not so long ago, the United States withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal, which led to renewed tensions between the two countries. Iran's nuclear activities have accelerated, and US sanctions against Iran have escalated again, and a series of incidents have become the fuse for the two countries' hostilities. Why didn't the United States dare to go to war against Iran?This is not because the United States has lost its force, but because the pressure and risks behind it make this decision extremely difficult.
First of all, Iran's geographical location cannot be ignored. Located in the heart of the Middle East, Iran is one of the world's leading oil and gas exporters, controlling the entrances and exits of the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz. This makes it difficult for the United States to carry out effective military strikes, and America's allies and interests are threatened and influenced by Iran. A war could trigger instability in the Middle East, with a global energy and economic crisis.
Second, Iran's military strength is also a big test. Although Iran is not a nuclear-armed state, its large and powerful conventional army and some loyal militias, such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and the Quds Force, make it difficult for the United States to effectively deter Iran militarily. Iran's military capabilities should not be underestimated, posing a serious challenge to U.S. military operations, not only will Iran resist and retaliate, but may also lead to U.S. military losses and personnel**.
In addition, Iran's diplomatic tactics have created difficulties for the United States. Although Iran has been sanctioned from many aspects, its unique diplomatic strategy has allowed it to establish certain cooperation and ties with some important countries and organizations, such as Russia, Syria, Allah in Lebanon, and the Houthis in Yemen. This makes it difficult for the United States to effectively isolate Iran diplomatically, and it also makes American diplomatic actions opposed and interfered with by some countries and organizations. A war against Iran would not only provoke condemnation and boycott from the international community, but would also put the United States diplomatically in an awkward position, isolated.
All this seems to constitute a large and complex dilemma that discourages the United States. However, in addition to Iran itself, the United States also faces other pressures and challenges. The United States is tired of military involvement in the Middle East, and people no longer want to see the United States involved in a protracted war. Politically, the two parties are divided on their policies toward Iran, and there is a lack of unity and coordination. And America's allies are also opposed to a war against Iran, both in the Middle East and in Europe, fearing that such a war would bring them greater security threats and economic losses.
In such a situation, we can't help but ask, in addition to Iran, what other pressures does the United States face?What is it that makes the United States afraid to really use force against Iran?Are there deeper reasons for this, and will it affect the overall stability of the Middle East?
The tension this time has also attracted the attention and heated discussions of the majority of netizens. Some netizens said that the United States' attitude towards Iran is incomprehensible, obviously it has a strong military force, but it hesitates at a critical moment, is the United States no longer the country that "said one thing and the other" in the past?Others argue that the long-term U.S. intervention in the Middle East has caused many problems, and that more attention should be paid to domestic issues and no more involvement in disputes in the region. Some netizens also expressed concern about the allies of the United States, believing that the actions of the United States may bring greater security threats to the allies.
In general, the reason why the United States does not dare to go to war against Iran is not only because of the complex situation in Iran itself, but also because of the predicament caused by various internal and external factors. This concerns not only the United States and Iran, but also the future of the entire Middle East region. We hope that the international community will approach this issue rationally, resolve differences through dialogue and cooperation, and contribute to global peace and stability.
However, looking at U.S.-Iran relations from a Chinese perspective, perhaps we can better understand why the United States is taking every step of the way on the Iranian issue. It is not difficult to find that the hesitation and concern of the United States is not a lack of determination, but an inevitable choice after careful consideration.
First of all, as Chinese, we are no strangers to the affairs of the Middle East. The U.S. military involvement in this land has brought endless wars and turmoil. We are deeply disturbed by the heavy price paid by many countries in the process. What we want to see is a peaceful and stable Middle East, not one of conflicts and wars. Therefore, it is also in line with our expectations that the United States should be cautious in its approach to Iran, taking into account the security and stability of the entire region.
Secondly, Iran and China have always maintained a certain cooperative relationship. As a participant in the Belt and Road Initiative, Iran and China have close exchanges and cooperation in the fields of economy and culture. For China, Iran is an important strategic partner, and the cooperation between the two countries is not only conducive to economic development, but also conducive to promoting regional prosperity and harmony. The U.S. hardline stance on Iran is bound to have a negative impact on China-Iran relations, which we do not want to see.
Moreover, the actions of the United States have implications for global economic and energy security. As one of the world's largest economies, the interaction between China and the United States is not only related to both sides, but also affects the world. If a war breaks out in the Middle East, it will cause oil prices to soar and deal a heavy blow to the global economy. This is undoubtedly worse for the world economy, which is recovering. At this level, we can understand the United States' concerns about going to war, because it is in the interests of the whole world.
From the perspective of ***, a war between the United States and Iraq may not be a good thing for China. The spread of war could spill over the turmoil in the Middle East to the surrounding region, and China, as an Asian power, will have to face more severe diplomatic and security tests. Therefore, we are not surprised by the cautious attitude of the United States on Iran, after all, it is in our common interest to maintain regional stability and peace.
On the Internet, many netizens have also expressed their opinions. Some said that the U.S. tough stance on Iran was troubling and that it was not in line with today's trend of multilateralism and that differences should be resolved through dialogue. Others have questioned America's allies, arguing that the United States should consider the interests of other countries more than pursuing its own strategic goals. These remarks reflect the Chinese people's concern about international affairs and their expectation for a peaceful settlement of disputes.
Overall, from the perspective of the Chinese, we understand the cautious attitude of the United States on the Iranian issue. What we want to see is a peaceful and stable Middle East region and a world in which the international community can resolve disputes through dialogue and consultation. We believe that through the joint efforts of all parties, the current crisis can be resolved and the world can be promoted in a more harmonious and prosperous direction.