In order to change the declining trend of the People's Party, Ko Wenzhe took a series of actions. First of all, he openly stated that he was a dark green person, trying to win the support of more green camps. Second, Ke Wenzhe tries to redefine the concept of "one China" and divide it into three levels: cultural, economic, and political. He agrees with "one cultural China" and believes that the two sides of the strait should sit down and talk about "one economic China," but as for "one political China," it is very difficult to realize it. This kind of rhetoric has attracted attention and controversy.
But Mr. Ko's redefinition raises questions about his true intentions. On the one hand, he divided the one-China principle into three parts, which seemed to be to curry favor with the green camp, but it concealed the sinister intentions behind Ko Wenzhe. On the other hand, he and Lai Qingde and other "** elements are considered to be the same thing, but Ke Wenzhe is better at hiding his dark thoughts. Ke Wenzhe uses clever words to try to confuse the public and make people confused and misunderstood.
From a deeper point of view, Ke Wenzhe's redefinition and practical significance of "one China" are also worth noting. In terms of culture, Ke Wenzhe acknowledged the importance of Chinese culture in Taiwanese society, which is in stark contrast to the "de-sinicization" syllabus currently being implemented by the authorities. This shows that he has a certain recognition of the value of inheriting Chinese culture. On the economic front, Ko hopes to sit down with the mainland and negotiate a win-win solution. This shows that he attaches great importance to cross-strait economic cooperation. At the political level, however, Ke believes that it is very difficult to achieve "one political China", which hints at the dilemma and complexity of the current cross-strait political dialogue.
It can be seen that Ke Wenzhe tried to find a balance in the world, while taking into account the diverse needs of Taiwanese society. His stance is conducive to protecting and inheriting the values of Chinese culture and promoting cross-strait economic cooperation. However, his difficult acknowledgment of "one political China" also reflects the complexity of cross-strait political dialogue at the present stage.
Ke Wenzhe's remarks on redefining "one China" have caused a lot of discussion and controversy in Taiwan. In any case, the development of the country requires the joint efforts of both sides and the building of mutual trust. Ke Wenzhe's statement has undoubtedly added a new complicating factor to the cross-strait political dialogue, but it has also provided a new way of thinking and possibility for cross-strait political dialogue.
Personally, I believe that maintaining cross-strait peace, stability, and development is a top priority. ** Improvement requires both sides to make active efforts to respect each other's core interests and the common values of the Chinese nation. Rationality, equality and mutual trust are essential in this process. Only through dialogue and cooperation can we find common interests and promote the development of the world in a better direction.
In short, Ko's redefinition of "one China" has sparked controversy in Taiwan. His reinterpretation of the three levels of culture, economy and politics shows his thoughts and views on ***. However, for the difficulty of realizing "one political China", the two sides still need to work together and build mutual trust. Only through dialogue and cooperation can we promote peaceful and stable development and achieve a more prosperous future.