At the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty, the empire declined, and China entered an era of relative chaos. Cao Wei rose strongly, and Shu Han's power was weak. In "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", Guan Yu let Cao Cao go, and Huarong became a watershed in history. Why did you miss this opportunity?**Three major consequences, Shu Han may survive because of this.
Background: The Battle of Red Cliffs reveals Cao Cao's weaknesses.
After Cao Cao's victory over Guandu in the north, he went south to capture Jingzhou and Jiangdong. Jingzhou fell into chaos, and Liu Cong surrendered to Cao Cao. The Sun-Liu alliance used fire to break Cao Cao's army in the Battle of Chibi, and Cao Cao was defeated by Huarong Dao. Guan Yu let Cao Cao go, or it was not a simple kindness in return.
Ingredient 1: Shuhan civil strife crisis.
Zhuge Liang sent Guan Yu to anticipate Cao Cao's escape, not to kill the enemy. Guan Yu is arrogant, this time he will not obey Zhuge Liang's military orders, and will bow his head in front of Zhuge Liang. Killing Cao Cao may lead to infighting among Shu Han, with sharp contradictions, which is not conducive to the development of weak Shu Han.
Ingredient 2: Cao Wei and Shu Han became mortal enemies.
If Cao Cao died, Cao Wei's power may be turbulent, but not chaotic. Xiahou's family, Cao's and other relatives or successors. Cao Wei may take revenge on Shu Han, who is facing annihilation. The infighting may make Shu Han lose the power to resist.
Consequence 3: Eastern Wu gave up the Shu-Han Alliance.
Cao Cao was defeated, the situation in Eastern Wu changed, and Shu Han no longer needed the alliance. Cao Wei's spearhead was directed at Shu Han, and the Sun-Liu alliance broke down. Shu Han asked for help from Eastern Wu or faced difficulties, and in the era of the Three Kingdoms, Liu Bei lost Jingzhou.
Summary: If Guan Yu doesn't kill Cao Cao, Shu Han may be able to survive.
Guan Yu did not kill Cao Cao, perhaps it was a wise move. Shu Han needed to survive in troubled times and remain flexible, and Zhuge Liang intended to reconcile internal contradictions through Guan Yu. Cao Wei's revenge and Eastern Wu's betrayal may become a turning point in the history of Shu Han. If Cao Cao defeats Chibi, history may go in a different direction.
Cao Cao walked the Huarong Road, Guan Yu lost the killing machine, and the history of Shu Han has changed one more time" article deeply analyzes the choice of key moments in the Three Kingdoms period, especially the potential consequences of Guan Yu's failure to kill Cao Cao. By revealing historical turning points, this article presents readers with the three-legged Warring States pattern of Cao Wei, Shu Han, and Eastern Wu, especially highlighting the three important consequences that Guan Yu may have caused by letting Cao Cao go.
First of all, through a review of the Battle of Chibi, the article highlights the great impact of the fire attack on Cao Cao's army. After Cao Cao's victory in the north, he moved south to capture Jingzhou, however, the defeat at the Battle of Chibi dashed Cao Cao's dream of unifying the world. This turning point is vividly and concretely depicted, allowing the reader to better understand why Cao Cao lost Huarong Dao and laid the groundwork for Guan Yu to let Cao Cao go.
Secondly, through the analysis of Guan Yu's character, the article puts forward Guan Yu's arrogant characteristics and explains why Zhuge Liang sent Guan Yu there. Guan Yu let Cao Cao go, not only to repay Cao Cao's kindness in the past, but also to avoid the escalation of internal contradictions in Shu Han. This profound insight reveals the complexity of historical figures, focusing not only on the actions of individuals, but also on their impact on the course of history as a whole.
Then, the article makes a detailed argument on the three major consequences that may result from Guan Yu's failure to kill Cao Cao. The three consequences of the Shu Han infighting, the sworn enemy of Cao Wei and Shu Han, and the abandonment of the Shu Han alliance by Eastern Wu are explained one by one, so that readers can clearly see the far-reaching impact of Guan Yu's every move on the entire Three Kingdoms pattern. This argumentation is both on-topic and logical, making the essay more convincing.
Finally, the article echoes the title of the article in the summary section, emphasizing that Guan Yu may have made a wise move not to kill Cao Cao, highlighting the survival wisdom of Shu Han in troubled times. This summary not only responds to the main purpose of the article, but also leads readers to think deeply about the impact of the choices of historical figures at specific moments on the direction of the whole history.
In general, this commentary** has made an in-depth and detailed analysis of the original text, and has made in-depth reflections on the three major consequences of Guan Yu's failure to kill Cao Cao. Through the analysis of historical events, it not only restores the changes in the Three Kingdoms period for readers, but also triggers in-depth thinking about the behavior of historical figures.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!