Recently, have you seen some sensational articles with headlines on social **, such as "China's Biggest Leak", "Iron Man Wang Jinxi's **, Shocked the Chinese", "How Bullish Are the Japanese?".Take a look at this ** and you'll understand!And so on. This kind of content often causes great excitement and surprise among the public, but is all this true?
1. 1964 "China Pictorial" ** authenticity investigation.
Did the iron man Wang Jinxi mentioned in the article really publish it in the 1964 "China Pictorial"?After careful searching, we found that this ** did not appear in the pictorial of that year. In fact, we found the relevant **, but it actually appeared in the 04th issue of the "China Pictorial" in 1966, with the title "Wang Jinxi Visits the Northern Suburbs Kindergarten". It can be seen that there are errors in the information of the article.
2. Inferences about Wang Jinxi's dressing.
The article claimed that Japanese intelligence experts deduced the location of the Daqing oil field through Wang Jinxi's clothing. However, there is a problem with the logic of inferring latitude from clothing. "Lever clothing" in the 60s was widely used in the early days of the development of the oil industry in our country, and not only in winter in the region of 46° to 48° north latitude. In fact, many oil fields in China, such as Qinghai Oilfield, Karamay Oilfield, Yumen Oilfield, etc., have very low winter temperatures, far lower than the so-called "inferred area".
3. The irrelevance of the grip posture to the diameter of the oil well.
The article mentions that the diameter of the oil well can be inferred from Wang Jinxi's grip posture, which is not accurate. The diameter of an oil well is mainly determined by the size of the drill bit, not the posture of a person holding the handle. Even if the diameter of the oil well is deduced, it has no practical significance. In addition, it is groundless to infer the reserves and production of oil fields by standing up, and it is pure nonsense.
Fourth, the statement that Japan has made tens of millions of dollars.
The article claims that Japanese companies export oil equipment to China based on the so-called leaked information, making tens of millions of dollars. However, according to historical records, after the discovery of the Daqing oil field in China in 1959, a self-sufficient oil industry gradually emerged. China and Japan normalized diplomatic relations in 1972, and it was not until 1984 that the Daqing Oilfield introduced its first Japanese-made petroleum machinery. Therefore, the so-called ** plot is completely detached from the actual historical background.
To sum up, there are many inaccuracies in the content of this article. When we read similar articles, we must keep rational thinking, and verify the information through various channels to avoid being misled when describing historical events. In the age of information, it is the responsibility of each of us to keep a clear head.
Demystifying the Myths: A Review of the Essay "China's Biggest Rumors Debunked".
Recently, there has been an eye-catching article circulating on social **, entitled "China's Biggest Rumor Revealed: The Truth of the Iron Man Wang Jinxi Leakage Incident**, the shocking story you absolutely don't know!".》。This article focuses on the review and interpretation of past events, revealing the truth of a series of rumors about the Iron Man King Jinxi. In the article, the author dissects the rumors one by one from a critical point of view, and calls on readers to think rationally when facing information.
First of all, through the investigation of the 1964 "China Pictorial", the article revealed that the iron man Wang Jinxi's ** was not really published in that year. This seriously shakes the original tone of the article, which is the declassification of China's biggest leak. Based on facts, the author shows that accurate verification of information is an important step in understanding historical events, and it also calls on the public to have a sense of responsibility and truth-seeking when disseminating information.
Secondly, for Wang Jinxi's clothing inference, the article clearly points out that there are problems with its logic. In the 60s, the so-called "leveraged clothing" was widely used in the early days of China's oil industry, and was not limited to the region between 46° and 48° north latitude. By comparing the winter temperatures of several oil fields in China, this paper reveals the impracticality of the clothing logic of inferring latitude. This point of view reminds us that when we come into contact with information, we should pay attention to the quality and rationality of the information, and not be deceived by exaggerated words.
Thirdly, regarding the relationship between the grip posture and the diameter of the well, the article points out the irrelevance of this inference. The authors believe that the diameter of an oil well depends primarily on the size of the drill bit, rather than the posture of a person holding the handle. This kind of in-depth analysis makes it clearer for readers to understand that the interpretation of information should not be too subjective and conjectural, but need to be scientifically based. The argument in the article that Wang Jinxi's standing posture is used to infer oilfield reserves and production is a kind of revelation of exaggeration, emphasizing the importance of rational analysis behind the information.
Finally, the article questioned the claim that Japanese companies were making tens of millions of dollars. Through a review of historical records, the author makes it clear that after China normalized diplomatic relations with Japan in 1972, it was not until 1984 that Japanese-made petroleum machinery was introduced. The restoration of this historical background makes the final plot of the article seem groundless, and triggers a deep reflection on the authenticity of the information.
To sum up, this article provides readers with a perspective for rational thinking through in-depth analysis and fact-checking of rumors. In the current era of rapid information dissemination and rumors, we need to be more vigilant in the face of all kinds of information, not to believe rumors, pay attention to fact verification, and always maintain the ability to rationally distinguish information. Such a spirit of speculation is the cornerstone of building a true information society.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!