At present, the main controversy about pre-made dishes is not about their quality, safety or suitability for consumption, but about whether pre-made dishes can be compulsorily promoted through a specific system. The core issue involved in this is the contradiction between the system and human nature.
To put it simply, those who believe that pre-made dishes can be promoted through a certain system, believing that such a system can effectively restrain people's behavior, such as human intervention in the production process of pre-made dishes, ignoring the quality, safety and hygiene of ingredients, and improper use of additives.
The opposing side argues that relying solely on institutions cannot truly constrain human nature. People can do anything to pursue their own interests, and the problem of food safety cannot be solved by relying on the system alone, as people will always try to find loopholes.
This actually involves the question of whether the system shapes human nature, or whether human nature shapes the system. In short, the question is whether people's behavior is conditioned by the system or influenced by human nature.
A widely accepted view is that institutions shape human nature, because human nature is **, but a good system can show the goodness of human nature while limiting human nature.
Although this sentence sounds very reasonable, there is a problem here, that is, the system is made by people, it can regulate people's behavior, affect the good and evil of human nature, but cannot determine the nature of human nature. Whether it is now or a thousand or ten thousand years from now, human nature should be good, but it should also be **. Historical experience tells us that institutions do not really determine whether people are good or evil.
Therefore, it is clear that there is no subordinate connection between the system and human nature.
In fact, there is no need to argue about this issue, because the nature of the system does not determine the nature of man, because the nature of man is the embodiment of his daily purpose in everyday life. In everyday life, the way we think, the things we encounter, and the first reactions we take away reveal what we are all about.
So, what exactly is the purpose of everyday life?The purpose of everyday life is the way of life. Of all the elements that may affect human nature, Xi is regarded as the most important. For example, people's daily intuitions reflect their life Xi and can also be seen as a concrete manifestation of human nature and instinct.
Therefore, institutions must not only have an impact on people's character, but only by changing people's Xi can it truly shape people's nature. This relationship can be briefly described as the influence of institutions on life, which in turn has an impact on human nature. It is only in this context that we can argue that institutions have an indirect impact on human nature.
This also illustrates why, on a large scale, human nature seems to be in a non-core state in the system. If the system does not change people's Xi, then how does it shape human nature? Therefore, from the perspective of human nature, the system does not have a broad impact.
More explicitly, it is only when a system has an impact on a certain aspect of people's lives that it will have an effect on human nature through that aspect;And if the system does not have an impact on people's lives, then the corresponding human characteristics in this aspect will not be constrained by the system.
From this point of view, pre-made dishes try to change people's lifestyles through mandatory promotion means, which is actually a challenge to human nature.
Because people's basic need for food is first and foremost safety. Therefore, even if you want to change people's expectations about food, you should not only start with the food itself, but also from the safety of the food. Whether it is safe to eat, and whether the system can solve this problem, is theoretically acceptable.
But it takes time to validate and put real action into action. If these two premises are not satisfied, you will not be able to find the root cause of the problem from the perspective of human nature, and if you always feel that others do not trust you, it is not the right thing to do.
So, does human nature have an impact on the system?First of all, we need to be clear that institutions are not groundless, but set by people.
Once this view is confirmed, and considering that institutions are set by people, the connection between institutions and people becomes even closer. Moreover, once a system is established, it must be implemented, and the process of implementation is very closely linked to people.
Isn't that a matter of formulation and implementation?If the formulation of the system is only decided by a certain person or a few people, then we can think that the formulation of the system does not involve the nature of the majority of people, but the implementation does involve the nature of the majority of people.
If a system is merely developed, but cannot be effectively implemented and enforced, then such a system cannot be considered normal.
In other words, only when the establishment and implementation of a system are combined, can it be regarded as a complete system, and the essence of the system is determined by human nature. Since the establishment and implementation of a system is necessary, it is considered complete only when it is widely recognized.
From this point of view, institutions are influenced by the universal human factor. If it does not meet the universal needs of humanity, then the system will not be sustainable. Therefore, the act of forcibly promoting pre-made dishes is actually against human nature.