This article is about you, as a party, to defend your rights after the conclusion of the second instance in cases where the truth of the case is indeed beneficial to you and the case materials such as the judgment documents themselves are problematic.
When a certain stage of litigation fails, if you think that it is useless to go through this stage in vain, then you have entered a big misunderstanding of rights protection in the later stage. Because every stage of the litigation in your later stage of rights protection, even if it fails, it will lay the foundation for you to overturn the case on a certain day in the future.
Then some parties will think, then why not go directly to the provincial high court and the supreme court. If you do this, you will not only easily waste some of the litigation stages you can go through, but also increase the probability of the provincial high court and the Supreme Court rejecting you (directly dismissing you on the basis that you did not follow the logic of the process), and also increase the probability of being rejected if you enter the provincial high court or the Supreme Court again after rejection, and also increase some other risks for you. Therefore, if you want to defend your rights, it is wise to go in the most advantageous order (I have written about this before).
There are also parties who think that it is okay to deal with a certain stage of litigation (for example, thinking that the case is basically useless in the local area) without carefully preparing the materials. If you do, you are not responsible for yourself. Because the rejection after you have prepared carefully will be more conducive to your subsequent preparation of materials and improve the overall success rate of the case than the rejection after you have not prepared carefully. Moreover, all those who initiate a retrial are carefully prepared materials.
It is important to remind that if it is a case like this in the first paragraph, as long as it persists, the case will definitely be overturned.